Update nodemailer-ses-transport to version 1.4.0 🚀

[greenkeeperio-bot]

Hello lovely humans,

nodemailer-ses-transport just published its new version 1.4.0.

State	Update 🚀
Dependency	nodemailer-ses-transport
New version	1.4.0
Type	dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of nodemailer-ses-transport.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴

---

The new version differs by 15 commits .

• fdda808 v1.4.0
• 2f3b840 Merge pull request #21 from massimocode/master
• 1e2c0fd Fix ESLint error
• c91462d Add maxConnections throttle for poor connections
• b0a2ba6 Merge pull request #19 from FabriceGaudin/master
• 54574a7 Add Source parameter to mail
• 106aff0 Merge pull request #18 from FabriceGaudin/master
• b6afd04 forgotten useless parameter
• 6b57a01 processQueue with constant frequency
• 993ed4c v1.3.1
• 93cb395 Merge pull request #16 from simllll/master
• fb74ec1 catch errors during generateMessage
• 9a1e4d4 v1.3.0
• 5c341c7 Merge pull request #13 from yamayo/fix-ratelimit
• 394bd94 Fix behavior of set option rateLimit

See the full diff.

---

This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

_{Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade}

[orangejulius]

We don't have unit tests for this (see #59), but I tested sending emails locally with this branch and it worked.