sync: use TCT block acceleration #1716
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 255642e The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 9 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
Looks like the repo could disable the |
TalDerei
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this implementation appears to achieve parity with the core. Preliminary benchmarks indicate a sync performance improvement of approximately 60%, which aligns with our analysis here.
benchmarks:
- mainnet
- testnet whale seedphrase
- ~900k blocks
- crouton rpc
without TCT block acceleration: 285 seconds
with TCT block acceleration: 175 seconds
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relevant to #1576; I believe this code does the correct behavior but I've only checked that it compiles. Posting so it can get pulled into other work streams