drop the /v8 from linux/arm64/v8

[PromoFaux]

What does this PR aim to accomplish?:

CI is using linux/arm64/v8 in the platform matrix, we should be using linux/arm64. I think. Lets see what the tests say...

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

1. I have read and understood the contributors guide, as well as this entire template. I understand which branch to base my commits and Pull Requests against.
2. I have commented my proposed changes within the code and I have tested my changes.
3. I am willing to help maintain this change if there are issues with it later.
4. It is compatible with the EUPL 1.2 license
5. I have squashed any insignificant commits. (git rebase)

---

• I have read the above and my PR is ready for review. Check this box to confirm

[PromoFaux]

Looks good so far:

[PromoFaux]

Ready for review

[yubiuser]

I wonder if we now still need both TARGETPLATFORM set from 5c7ff5c

(I get always confused by the nested docker build on top of docker builds)

[PromoFaux]

That was what my deleted comment was about.. I tried to build locally with that removed (run as PLATFORM=linux/arm64/v8 ./build-and-test.sh and the result was the following:

So that part is still needed I believe.

[PromoFaux]

Both --platform=linux/arm64 and --platform=linux/arm64/v8 are valid and will produce a linux/arm64 image (per the link you shared earlier

The docker-in-docker stuff probably adds some complexity, and something we should look at finding another way around one day. But not this day. For now we can just use the simple form of the platform argument

Edit: And it's all part of the fun and games of having an open beta. More eyes to catch this stuff!

[PromoFaux]

Watching the next publish like a hawk...

Edit:

All good