Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update REMIND input data after unit shift #281

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

fbenke-pik
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ toolEdgeTransportSA <- function(SSPscen,
########################################################
if (is.null(outputFolder) & isStored) stop("Please provide an outputfolder to store your results")
if (is.null(gdxPath)) {gdxPath <- file.path(getConfig("sourcefolder"),
"REMINDinputForTransportStandalone", "fulldata.gdx")}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this mean, you substituted the old fulldata.gdx file? Should we keep it to be able to reproduce old input data? Why not renaming the file which is read in?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@fbenke-pik fbenke-pik Sep 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I use the approach we agreed on for inputdata versioning:

  • create version folders and move the files to each folder
  • create a symlink in the root folder linking to the old file for backwards compatibility

Please take a look at the folders and files on the cluster.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, it is a subfolder, fine!

@johannah-pik
Copy link
Contributor

We could also include a readme with information about the REMIND run (maybe at least a path on the cluster).
To make sure: Is this a 21 region gdx?

@fbenke-pik fbenke-pik merged commit a4d2267 into pik-piam:master Sep 27, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants