reuse kvstore when init autoid service

[ystaticy]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bb7133 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tiprow]

Hi @ystaticy. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.5293%. Comparing base (1d0c33a) to head (d14318b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #58860        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.1047%   73.5293%   +0.4245%     
================================================
  Files          1677       1677                
  Lines        463904     463948        +44     
================================================
+ Hits         339136     341138      +2002     
+ Misses       103909     101957      -1952     
+ Partials      20859      20853         -6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	42.9886% <70.0000%> (?)
unit	72.3015% <90.0000%> (+0.0024%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	45.7359% <ø> (+0.0059%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/invalid-title label, please follow title format, for example pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed or *: what is changed.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}

---

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}

---

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked label, please finished the tests then check the finished items in description.

For example:

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}