Moderate ** claims in docs + rework title #353
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks, I think we can either drop the code formatting in title or in this case just remove the symbols (so the title would just be "Exponentiation") |
Co-authored-by: Etienne Bacher <[email protected]>
etiennebacher
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@etiennebacher TY for your persistence. I previously had issues rendering ** examples with ::reprex and in docs examples. I cannot reproduce that anymore. I likely have have done something as silly as using a dev load instead of fully building the package.
BTW it seems titles do not support quotes. Is it better to just avoid quotes in titles ?