add 2023_OlaldeCarrion_Roman

[TCLamnidis]

Adds package 2023_OlaldeCarrion_Roman

Linked to poseidon-framework/minotaur-recipes#12

[TCLamnidis]

This is the initial Minotaur package for 2023_OlaldeCarrion_Roman. I would now need @PCQuilis and/or @danimfernandes to fill in missing meta-information in the janno file, like:

• Group_Name
• Alternative_IDs
• Relation_To
• Relation_Degree
• Relation_Type
• Relation_Note
• Collection_ID
• Country
• Country_ISO
• Location
• Site
• Latitude
• Longitude
• Date_Type
• Date_C14_Labnr
• Date_C14_Uncal_BP
• Date_C14_Uncal_BP_Err
• Date_BC_AD_Start
• Date_BC_AD_Median
• Date_BC_AD_Stop
• Date_Note
• MT_Haplogroup
• Y_Haplogroup
• Source_Tissue
• Primary_Contact
• Publication
• Note
• Keywords

[stschiff]

OK, is this actually happening, is someone preparing the meta-data? Or shall we accept this package without the meta-data for now and fill it in later?

[danimfernandes]

I told Thiseas I'd do it but didn't manage to get to it yet. I'll look into it tomorrow!

[PCQuilis]

Sorry I didn't have any time to look into this. Will you manage @danimfernandes ?

[danimfernandes]

Here is the file! I hope it's fine. I also filled in the Genetic Sex column, even though it was not in the list above. I tried to follow the details from www.poseidon-adna.org/#/janno_details for filling each column.

2023_OlaldeCarrion_Roman.zip

[TCLamnidis]

One thing to note:
for I15501 we get

RateX	RateY	RateErrX	RateErrY
0.865	0.454	0.0406	0.0359

Which would suggest an aneuploidy, but in the paper they specifically checked and find no evidence for one (see S2, Table 11)

[nevrome]

Looks all good. I only saw two things:

1. The description field in the .janno file is not filled yet. My suggestion: "139 Balkan individuals dated to the Roman, Migration, and Early Medieval Period (1st millennium CE)"
2. As always the package version should be changed to v1.0.0 before merging.

[TCLamnidis]

I have been adding the title of the publication as the description so far, so I did the same here.

After talking with @PCQuilis and @BenRohrlach, and double-checking the result for I15501, I have marked the individual as XXY in the Notes field.

@nevrome have another look. when i get approval I can merge this in :)