Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🫖 ApiChai #218

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 3, 2024
Merged

🫖 ApiChai #218

merged 12 commits into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

that-jill
Copy link
Contributor

Placeholder for a tool that will standardize API integration best practices

@that-jill that-jill requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2024 18:29
@powerhome-portal
Copy link

A change to Portal catalog files was detected in your PR. Please visit this link to preview changes: https://portal-staging.powerapp.cloud/catalog?filters[kind]=all&filters[user]=all&filters[namespaceFilter]=jk-apichai

@powerhome-portal
Copy link

A change to documentation files was detected in your PR. Please visit this link to preview changes: https://portal-staging.powerapp.cloud/docs?filters[kind]=all&filters[user]=all&filters[namespaceFilter]=jk-apichai

@that-jill that-jill enabled auto-merge (squash) January 3, 2024 18:56
@xjunior
Copy link
Contributor

xjunior commented Jan 3, 2024

Can you also install appraisals and define Appraisal's for (at least) rails 6.1 and rails 6.0?

@that-jill
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you also install appraisals and define Appraisal's for (at least) rails 6.1 and rails 6.0?

@xjunior done. This is just a placeholder for now, but the appraisal stuff will be nice to have once we start setting up this gem in earnest

@that-jill that-jill merged commit 29879eb into main Jan 3, 2024
133 checks passed
@that-jill that-jill deleted the jk/api_chai branch January 3, 2024 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants