wording

Co-authored-by: redoomed1 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: fria <[email protected]>

blog/posts/pwa-vs-iwa.md

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Google [distinguishes](https://chromeos.dev/en/web/isolated-web-apps) between th
   <figcaption>source: <a href="https://chromeos.dev/en/web/isolated-web-apps">Google</a></figcaption>
 </figure>
 
-This higher security assurance from isolated and signed web applications and the inherently more trusted nature of a natively installed app will allow for IWAs to safely have access to APIs that it wouldn't be safe to allow normal websites to access, like [Direct Sockets](https://github.com/WICG/direct-sockets/blob/main/docs/explainer.md).
+This higher security assurance from isolated and signed web applications and the inherently more trusted nature of a natively installed app will allow for IWAs to safely access APIs which wouldn't be safe to allow normal websites to access, like [Direct Sockets](https://github.com/WICG/direct-sockets/blob/main/docs/explainer.md).
 
 IWAs use a totally new [URL scheme](https://github.com/WICG/isolated-web-apps/blob/main/Scheme.md) since they're not relying on HTTPS certificate authorities or DNS. They're totally isolated from each other and the web using enforced Content Security Policy and Cross-Origin Isolation, hence the name.