-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add implementation for new ABI proxy_log_destination #336
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add implementation for new ABI proxy_log_destination #336
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vikas Choudhary <[email protected]>
c002720
to
4c28647
Compare
src/exports.cc
Outdated
if (e.first == dest.value()) { | ||
// write message to the file which is the value of the key if it exists | ||
std::ofstream log_file; | ||
log_file.open(e.second, std::ios::out | std::ios_base::app); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO, this should be done on the proxy-side, so that it can use optimized logging facilities (if they exist), work with sandboxing, etc.
Basically, this whole block could be replaced with:
context->log_with_destination(level, message.value(), dest.value());
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated, thanks!
src/exports.cc
Outdated
if (!dest) { | ||
return WasmResult::InvalidMemoryAccess; | ||
} | ||
context->log(level, dest.value()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debug leftover?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes. thanks for catching
Signed-off-by: Vikas Choudhary <[email protected]>
Implements proxy-wasm/spec#38.
@PiotrSikora @mathetake @anuraaga please see if going in right direction overall. Will add unit tests once confirmed.
I have tested the changes manually. Related changes in envoy, envoyproxy/envoy#26364
xref: envoyproxy/envoy#22669