Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use local idl #254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Use local idl #254

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

guibescos
Copy link
Contributor

@guibescos guibescos commented Nov 6, 2023

I prefer using the locally generated IDL than the on-chain IDL.
It feels more secure since the on-chain IDL can be upgraded.
Explorer will still use the on-chain IDL.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 6, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 6, 2023 6:39pm
staking-devnet ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 6, 2023 6:39pm

@guibescos guibescos merged commit c5c9479 into main Nov 6, 2023
8 checks passed
@guibescos guibescos deleted the use-local-idl branch November 6, 2023 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants