Contrib guide: more restructuring #1461
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @nedbat!
Looks great. Two minor comments but don't hold merge on them:
- Perhaps center or move the links into the titles of the landing page table
- On the code contributions communications page, flip flop Discourse to come before mailing lists.
🎉
| @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
| .. _c_code: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This made me think of C the language.
Are these c_ prefixes short for "contrib" and temporary whilst still a draft in parallel with the old devguide?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, exactly. I maybe should have explained that.
contrib/index.rst
Outdated
| }); | ||
| </script> | ||
| <style> | ||
| table.docutils td { vertical-align: top; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps we should move this to _static/devguide_overrides.css?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't know about that file. I think tables should default to top-aligned, but idk if this will affect other things badly as a global setting.
| *[I haven't adjusted the links in the table yet other than to add a link to the | ||
| major section at the top of each column.]* | ||
|
|
||
| .. list-table:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm trying to think which is better, lists inside a table, or smaller cells, from an accessibility point of view, and I'm not sure :)
The new table of lists might be better, because there's no relation between the old cells that happen to be next to each other; that is, the old way was just for presentation and not structure. So I think the list might be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other people I've talked with definitely felt like the one-link-per-cell style of the current home page table is misleading because the rows have no meaning.
contrib/index.rst
Outdated
| [The contents had been listed below here. It was very long, and I don't think | ||
| it was helpful. The left sidebar has the contents.] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, I found it helpful: I often cmd+F on the homepage to find something, which won't work with a collapsed left sidebar.
It is a little unusual to have a large table-of-contents on a page, although it is out of the way at the bottom of the page, and not so big as to be a performance problem (like, we definitely wouldn't want the whole CPython TOC).
But it's not the end of the world to remove it if no one else wants it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is fine to leave at the very bottom.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I put it back, but not as deep as before, so it's not so long.
|
@willingc the list has Repos, Discourse, Discord, Mailing lists, so I'm not sure what you are looking for. |
|
@willingc I also don't understand this:
|
|
Oh, "move the links into the titles," I see what you mean. I've changed it to this: |
nedbat
force-pushed
the
nedbat/landing-pages
branch
from
4939b1e to
d771c82
Compare
|
And another option: 
|
I wanted to order the list to roughly reflect where conversations happen today. I wanted to de-emphasize the mailing lists relative to Discourse and Repos. |
I'm continuing to look at the overall structure and move things around. Comments welcome. I wanted to flesh out the Code and Docs landing pages before making a real pull request, but maybe it's ok to merge this?
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-devguide--1461.org.readthedocs.build/