-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PyTorch 2.5 to regression test #1168
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/1168
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 16b6aa7 with merge base eb1fb3a (): This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
I think this is mergeable since we pinned nightly PyTorch. Mind just rebasing to main so we can see the sparse failures go away |
@@ -104,7 +105,13 @@ | |||
def _int8wo_api(mod): | |||
if TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_4: | |||
quantize_(mod, int8_weight_only(), set_inductor_config=False) | |||
if not TORCH_VERSION_AT_LEAST_2_5: | |||
if ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wow condition is becoming pretty complicated..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yean, ensure as much as test combination has been covered.
Replace #1100