-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for recursive datatypes #866
Open
abhi-glitchhg
wants to merge
9
commits into
pytorch:main
Choose a base branch
from
abhi-glitchhg:recursive_datatype
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6f74eb0
new mypy version released n support for recursive datatype
abhi-glitchhg 1713a61
small change
abhi-glitchhg fccb7c3
letsee
abhi-glitchhg 1e60919
lets go with 0.981 rn
abhi-glitchhg 14097bd
added --install-types flag in ci to install missing package stubs
abhi-glitchhg 459a1a9
enable recursive aliases
abhi-glitchhg 115d17a
supress the warning
abhi-glitchhg 5765f6c
Update .github/workflows/lint.yml
abhi-glitchhg 27e3c2d
Merge branch 'main' into recursive_datatype
abhi-glitchhg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also like to point out that,
--install-types --non-interactive
will install the missing package stubs hence slower.Quoting relevant part from the above documentation link :-
This is somewhat slower than explicitly installing stubs before running mypy, since it may type check your code twice – the first time to find the missing stubs, and the second time to type check your code properly after mypy has installed the stubs.
I don't think downloading the package stubs would be a bottleneck; but if it is, then we could think of using cached installations. (just a suggestion)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for providing the idea. I think it's fine for now as torchdata is still a small package. We might want to investigate if we have noticed significant overhead.