Release 0.6.4 #82
Release 0.6.4 #82
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)
25-25: Formatting improvement for Python 3.12 classifier.The trailing whitespace has been removed from the Python 3.12 classifier entry. This is a good practice for maintaining clean and consistent code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pyproject.toml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pyproject.toml (3)
7-7: Version bump to 0.6.4 looks good.The version has been updated from "0.6.4b0" to "0.6.4", indicating a transition from a beta to a stable release. This change aligns with the PR objectives.
82-82: Verify the addition ofchangelog_incremental = false.A new configuration option for
commitizenhas been added:changelog_incremental = false. This setting typically results in generating a full changelog each time, rather than an incremental one.Could you please confirm if this change is intentional and explain its purpose? It's worth noting that this modification wasn't mentioned in the PR description or summary.
Line range hint
1-82: Overall review summaryThe main objective of this PR, which was to bump the version to 0.6.4, has been successfully implemented. The changes are minimal and mostly as expected, with good attention to detail in formatting.
However, there's an additional change to the
commitizenconfiguration (changelog_incremental = false) that wasn't mentioned in the PR description. While this change doesn't affect the version bump itself, it could impact how changelogs are generated in the future. It would be beneficial to have more context on why this change was made and ensure it aligns with the project's changelog management strategy.
jakub-safetycli
added
minor
jakub-safetycli
force-pushed
the
release/0.6.4
branch
from
2241290
to
943e5fa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
36-36: Consider implementing quality, security, and style checksThere's a TODO comment about enforcing quality, security, and style checks in the CI workflow. Implementing these checks would significantly improve the overall code quality and security of the project.
Would you like assistance in implementing these checks? I can suggest some common tools and configurations for Python projects, such as:
- Flake8 for style checks
- Bandit for security checks
- Black for code formatting
- MyPy for type checking
Let me know if you'd like me to provide a sample configuration for any of these tools.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
21-21: Approved: Python version update in CI workflowThe removal of Python 3.7 from the testing matrix is consistent with the version bump to 0.6.4. This change focuses the CI process on more recent Python versions (3.8 to 3.12), which is a good practice for maintaining up-to-date compatibility.
To ensure this change is reflected in the project documentation, please run the following script:
If the script returns results mentioning Python 3.7 support, consider updating the documentation to reflect the new supported versions.
jakub-safetycli
removed
the
minor
| @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| strategy: | |||
| fail-fast: false | |||
| matrix: | |||
| python-version: [ "3.7", "3.8", "3.9", "3.10", "3.11", "3.12"] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version 3.7 is no longer available on macos causing the GitHub action to fail.
jakub-safetycli
force-pushed
the
release/0.6.4
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5409ddb
to
a5af2da
Compare
jakub-safetycli
force-pushed
the
release/0.6.4
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1a80ef6
to
a4c7989
Compare
jakub-safetycli
force-pushed
the
release/0.6.4
branch
from
a4c7989
to
06736eb
Compare
Pull Request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores