Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup of unused handlers #161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

jmartisk
Copy link
Contributor

@jmartisk jmartisk commented Aug 7, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Status for workflow Build

This is the status report for running Build on commit 3990e7c.

Failing Jobs

Status Name Step Failures Logs Raw logs
✔️ Build - JDK 11 Logs Raw logs
Build - JDK 17 Build with Maven Failures Logs Raw logs

Full information is available in the Build summary check run.

Failures

⚙️ Build - JDK 17 #

- Failing: servlet 
! Skipped: websocket websocket/core websocket/servlet and 1 more

📦 servlet

io.undertow.servlet.test.dispatcher.DispatcherForwardTestCase.testPathBasedInclude line 137 - More details - Source on GitHub

org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...etContext/dispatch /[dispatch]> but was:<...etContext/dispatch /[forward]>
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:117)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
	at io.undertow.servlet.test.dispatcher.DispatcherForwardTestCase.testPathBasedInclude(DispatcherForwardTestCase.java:137)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:569)

@gsmet gsmet merged commit 75b0040 into quarkusio:main Aug 7, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@jmartisk jmartisk deleted the learning-push-handler-cleanup branch August 7, 2024 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants