Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
One more 4.0 release notes update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
michaelklishin committed Sep 9, 2024
1 parent c2bb67a commit 61f53e2
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 5 deletions.
11 changes: 6 additions & 5 deletions release-notes/4.0.0.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
## RabbitMQ 4.0.0-beta.7
## RabbitMQ 4.0.0-rc.1

RabbitMQ `4.0.0-beta.7` is a preview of a new major release.
RabbitMQ `4.0.0-rc.1` is a preview of a new major release.

Starting June 1st, 2024, community support for this series will only be provided to [regularly contributing users](https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/blob/main/COMMUNITY_SUPPORT.md) and those who hold a valid [commercial support license](https://tanzu.vmware.com/rabbitmq/oss).

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -51,11 +51,12 @@ This limit is necessary to protect nodes from consumers that run into infinite f
consumers can drive a node out of disk space by making a quorum queue Raft log grow forever without allowing compaction
of older entries.

If 20 deliveries per message is a common scenario for a queue, a dead-lettering target must be configured
If 20 deliveries per message is a common scenario for a queue, a dead-lettering target or a higher limit must be configured
for such queues. The recommended way of doing that is via a [policy](https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/parameters#policies).
See the [Position Messaging Handling](https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/next/quorum-queues#poison-message-handling) section
in the quorum queue documentation guide.

The limit can be [increased](https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/next/quorum-queues#poison-message-handling) using a policy.
This option is recommended against: usually the presence of messages that have been redelivered 20 times or more suggests
Mote that increasing the limit is recommended against: usually the presence of messages that have been redelivered 20 times or more suggests
that a consumer has entered a fail-requeue-fail-requeue loop, in which case even a much higher limit
won't help avoid the dead-lettering.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 61f53e2

Please sign in to comment.