Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Reconcile etcd members on control plane scale down #265
🐛 Reconcile etcd members on control plane scale down #265
Changes from 8 commits
f5d65f1
8c04dbc
c7fe27c
51bf115
759d835
287254a
6fc88d9
dc58a8b
cf23a93
a7b3b2f
9025c94
c4b63e2
1ad956d
8ef8e20
5289859
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know we have a wide usage of
errors.Wrap
, we should start switching tofmt.Errorf
(not in this PR) https://github.com/pkg/errors package is no longer maintinedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are planning to support
controlPlane.RCP.Spec.Version
field as a source of the version(initially this provider contract was ignored), most likely we'll have to support both for some time.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, during the time we need to support both, we can just set a priority on one of the fields and ignore the other (unless the priority one is missing). This would probably make it simpler to then propagate the field to where it is used and won't require much change in code like the above. Just thinking out loud after seeing this, more of a comment than a review.