Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make --bounding-box less ideosyncratic #18

Open
redmer opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Make --bounding-box less ideosyncratic #18

redmer opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@redmer
Copy link
Owner

redmer commented Oct 24, 2023

The current v1 parameter is a bit ideosyncratic, with its space separated values, not using abbreviated bbox.

Proposal:

  1. rename to --bbox, rename --bounding-box-crs to --bbox-crs.
  2. change valuespace in accordance with https://docs.ogc.org/is/17-069r4/17-069r4.html#_parameter_bbox to comma-separated values

This is expected to be a breaking change? Or allow both types of values.

@redmer redmer added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 24, 2023
redmer added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2023
fixes: Make `--bounding-box` less ideosyncratic #18
@redmer redmer self-assigned this Oct 27, 2023
@redmer
Copy link
Owner Author

redmer commented Oct 27, 2023

Note that the order in --bounding-box is WESN; in ?bbox= is WSEN.

Suggestion:

  1. --bounding-box deprecated: "w e s n"
  2. --bbox: "w,s,e,n" or "w,s,_,e,n,_"

redmer added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
fixes: Make `--bounding-box` less ideosyncratic #18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant