Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Qualcomm feedback]: Fig 4 #56

Closed
rsahita opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Qualcomm feedback]: Fig 4 #56

rsahita opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rsahita
Copy link
Collaborator

rsahita commented Feb 6, 2024

Reference: link

Ref Figure 4

This logic does not include the (optional) finer-grained access control restriction in SmMTT PTEs (in particular to restrict C-memory access to read-only).

@rsahita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rsahita commented Mar 9, 2024

fixing this with a ref to the figure in the Smmtt spec directly.

@rsahita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rsahita commented Mar 10, 2024

Closing as addressed in PR #70
cc @ozkoyuncu

@rsahita rsahita closed this as completed Mar 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant