Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Possibility to use service as person_fn rather than a static function #93

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Possibility to use service as person_fn rather than a static function #93

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Commits on Dec 6, 2023

  1. Possibility to use service as person_fn rather than a static function

    @zinkovskiy
    zinkovskiy committed Dec 6, 2023
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    63e0453 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Feb 15, 2024

  1. Merge branch 'master' into possibility-to-use-service-as-preson_fn

    @zinkovskiy
    zinkovskiy authored Feb 15, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    1a936d6 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Mar 9, 2024

  1. Fix composer json

    @zinkovskiy
    zinkovskiy committed Mar 9, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    d8f3094 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Mar 10, 2024

  1. Add tests for new PersonProvider

    @zinkovskiy
    zinkovskiy committed Mar 10, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    976f284 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history