-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GeoPoseStamped interface for REP-147 to help clarify geographic orientation #407
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add GeoPoseStamped interface for REP-147 to help clarify geographic orientation #407
Conversation
|
||
A vehicle flying facing east will have a unit identity quaternion for its orientation. | ||
|
||
x,y,z=0, w=1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there is a more standard way to document the value for the quaternion (perhaps yaml), please supply a reference to the syntax I should use. Or, if we can find an authoritative reference on this definition of unit identity quaternion
, that would be great. The Wikipedia does not directly mention it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
x,y,z=0, w=1 | |
`x,y,z=[0,0,0], w=1` |
This pull request has been mentioned on ROS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.ros.org/t/september-2024-meetings-aerial-robotics-back-from-summer/39383/6 |
* This clarifies a standard way to publish global pose of a vehicle * Add another example to REP-103 to remove ambiguity Signed-off-by: Ryan Friedman <[email protected]>
8fd867d
to
02bfa52
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left a couple of suggestions, mostly to provide some help to developers.
|
||
A vehicle flying facing east will have a unit identity quaternion for its orientation. | ||
|
||
x,y,z=0, w=1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
x,y,z=0, w=1 | |
`x,y,z=[0,0,0], w=1` |
the unknown fields should be populated with ``NaN`` to avoid Null Island [#null_island]_. | ||
|
||
TODO add link to ArduPilot test code for orientation. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, I would also add the following quaternion transformations, which can be used to convert between Ardupilot's and REP-103 reference frames.
- Assuming that quaternion is expressed as
q = [w, x, y, z]
; ned
is North, East, Down, standard inertial Ardupilot's frame;fru
is Forward, Right, Up, standard Ardupilot's body frame;enu
is East, North, Up, REP-103 inertial frame;flu
is Forward, Left, Up, REP-103 body frame;
sq2_2 = sqrt(2)/2;
q_ned_2_enu = [0, sq2_2, sq2_2, 0];
q_enu_2_ned = [0, sq2_2, sq2_2, 0];
q_frd_2_flu = [0, 1, 0, 0];
q_flu_2_frd = [0, 1, 0, 0];
Assuming that we start from vehicle's quaternion q_frd_2_enu
from Ardupilot's telemetry, and we want to obtain its correspondent in REP-103 q_flu_2_enu
, then the following transformation is to be applied (where *
is the quaternion product):
q_flu_2_enu = q_ned_2_enu * q_frd_2_ned * q_flu_2_frd
Of course the inverse can be applied: if an orientation is known in RED-103 q_flu_2_enu
, that can be transformed into Ardupilot's frame q_frd_2_ned
with:
q_frd_2_ned = q_enu_2_ned * q_flu_2_enu * q_frd_2_flu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, although I wonder if the maintainers want the REP to be language agnostic. If they prefer code language agnostic, I can write it up in Latex or something.
Co-authored-by: Tiziano Fiorenzani <[email protected]>
this yaw value is NOT equal to the traditional compass bearing. | ||
|
||
In the situation that the position is known but orientation it not known, or vise versa, | ||
the unknown fields should be populated with ``NaN`` to avoid Null Island [#null_island]_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the unknown fields should be populated with ``NaN`` to avoid Null Island [#null_island]_. | |
the unknown fields should be populated with ``NaN`` to avoid Null Island [#null_island]_. | |
It is up to the platform to decide at what accuracy threshold the data will stop being published | |
or switch to ``NaN`. |
Thoughts on this for addressing accuracy?
Purpose
Recommend a standard way of publishing the pose of an aerial vehicle and clarify ambiguities with regards to geographic orientation values in outdoor scenarios.
Details
This clarifies a standard way to publish global pose of a vehicle. This has been adopted by the ArduPilot DDS interface and is part of the stable 4.5 release. I added another example to REP-103 to remove ambiguity of the orientation.
Once we add a test in ArduPilot for the orientation, I would like to link the code directly here in the REP as a reference.
Rendered
Alternatives
References to other implementations of this
Earliest documented support
This work was sponsored by AeroVironment.