-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include much more information in the intro block #28
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: kscottz <[email protected]>
# ROS Distro Considerations | ||
* ROS Distribtutions are created using [REP-134 Standards Track](https://ros.org/reps/rep-0143.html) as a guide. | ||
* Your package name should comply to [REP-144 ROS Package Naming](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-0144.html) | ||
* Your pacakge must build for all platforms and architectures on the ROS buildfarm. See [REP-2000 ROS Releases and Supported Platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html) for all supported platforms for your ROS Distro. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Your pacakge must build for all platforms and architectures on the ROS buildfarm. See [REP-2000 ROS Releases and Supported Platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html) for all supported platforms for your ROS Distro. | |
* Your package must build for all platforms and architectures on the ROS buildfarm. See [REP-2000 ROS Releases and Supported Platforms](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2000.html) for all supported platforms for your ROS Distro. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, this isn't entirely true. We allow packages that build for Ubuntu but not RHEL. But also the spelling error :P
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spelling fixed in f4f160f, but I'm still not sure how best to word this.
|
||
* [REP-2004 Package Quality Declaration](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html)-- The ROS 2 TGC has created a quality rating system for ROS packages. These ratings should serve as a guide for package developers. We recommend package developers achieve a quality level of three or higher. | ||
* Documentation -- at minimum ROS packages should include an extensive [README.md file, and API level documentation using the Sphinx documentation system](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Documenting-a-ROS-2-Package.html). | ||
* Maintainer Responsibilities -- the ROS 2 documentation includes a guide to [ROS package maintainer responsibilities](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Core-maintainer-guide.html) that summarizes your responsibilities as an open source maintainer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The guidelines there I believe are for ROS 2 core maintainers rather than community package maintainers. As long as there's nothing too controversial in there they should be applicable but I don't know that they're for all maintainers by design.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add a little disclaimer that they're not enforced outside of the core team, but we consider it best practices.
Co-authored-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris Lalancette <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #28 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.66% 87.51% -0.15%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 689 689
Branches 180 169 -11
==========================================
- Hits 604 603 -1
Misses 64 64
- Partials 21 22 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a few suggestions that you can fold in really quick. Otherwise looks good to me.
|
||
* [REP-2004 Package Quality Declaration](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html)-- The ROS 2 TSC has created a quality rating system for ROS packages. These ratings should serve as a guide for package developers. We recommend package developers achieve a quality level of three or higher. | ||
* Documentation -- it is recommended that ROS packages include an extensive [README.md file, and API level documentation using the Sphinx documentation system](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Documenting-a-ROS-2-Package.html). | ||
* Maintainer Responsibilities -- the ROS 2 documentation includes a guide to [ROS package maintainer responsibilities](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Core-maintainer-guide.html) that summarizes your responsibilities as an open source maintainer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Maintainer Responsibilities -- the ROS 2 documentation includes a guide to [ROS package maintainer responsibilities](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Core-maintainer-guide.html) that summarizes your responsibilities as an open source maintainer. | |
* Maintainer Responsibilities -- the ROS 2 documentation includes a guide to [ROS core package maintainer responsibilities](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Core-maintainer-guide.html) that summarizes your responsibilities as an open source maintainer. While we do not enforce these requirements on package maintainers they should be considered best practices. |
colcon | ||
committish | ||
connectionpool | ||
corge | ||
debian | ||
deserialized | ||
diffs | ||
distro |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we enforce "ROS 2" as replace a replacement for "ROS2"? 👿
|
||
This is an automated review generated by the [rosdistro-reviewer tool](https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rosdistro-reviewer). If you'd like the tool to run again, just [re-request review from GitHub Actions](https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rosdistro-reviewer?tab=readme-ov-file#running-rosdistro-reviewer-in-github-actions). | ||
This is an automated tool that helps check your pull request for correctness. This tool checks a number of attributes associated with your ROS package and generates a report that helps our reviewers merge your pull request in a timely fashion. Here are a few things to consider when sending adding or updating a package to ROS Distro. ROS Distro includes a very helpful [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file that we recommend reading if it is your first time submitting a package. Please also read the [ROS Distro review guidelines](https://github.com/rosdistro/rosdistro/blob/master/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md) which summarizes this release process. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an automated tool that helps check your pull request for correctness. This tool checks a number of attributes associated with your ROS package and generates a report that helps our reviewers merge your pull request in a timely fashion. Here are a few things to consider when sending adding or updating a package to ROS Distro. ROS Distro includes a very helpful [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file that we recommend reading if it is your first time submitting a package. Please also read the [ROS Distro review guidelines](https://github.com/rosdistro/rosdistro/blob/master/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md) which summarizes this release process. | |
This is an automated tool that helps check your pull request for correctness. This tool checks a number of attributes associated with your ROS package and generates a report that helps our reviewers merge your pull request in a timely fashion. | |
Here are a few things to consider when sending adding or updating a package to ROS Distro. | |
ROS Distro includes a very helpful [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) file that we recommend reading if it is your first time submitting a package. | |
Please also read the [ROS Distro review guidelines](https://github.com/rosdistro/rosdistro/blob/master/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md) which summarizes this release process. |
* [REP-2004 Package Quality Declaration](https://www.ros.org/reps/rep-2004.html)-- The ROS 2 TSC has created a quality rating system for ROS packages. These ratings should serve as a guide for package developers. We recommend package developers achieve a quality level of three or higher. | ||
* Documentation -- it is recommended that ROS packages include an extensive [README.md file, and API level documentation using the Sphinx documentation system](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Documenting-a-ROS-2-Package.html). | ||
* Maintainer Responsibilities -- the ROS 2 documentation includes a guide to [ROS package maintainer responsibilities](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/How-To-Guides/Core-maintainer-guide.html) that summarizes your responsibilities as an open source maintainer. | ||
* We recommend that your package should strive to conform to the [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Developer-Guide.html) and the [ROS 2 Style Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Code-Style-Language-Versions.html). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* We recommend that your package should strive to conform to the [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Developer-Guide.html) and the [ROS 2 Style Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Code-Style-Language-Versions.html). | |
* We recommend that your package should strive to conform to the [ROS 2 Developer Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Developer-Guide.html) and the [ROS 2 Style Guide](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/The-ROS2-Project/Contributing/Code-Style-Language-Versions.html). | |
# Need Help? | |
Please post your questions to [Robotics Stack Exchange](https://docs.ros.org/) or refer to the `#infra-help` channel on our [Discord server](https://discord.com/servers/open-robotics-1077825543698927656). | |
Demo: cottsay/rosdistro#24
It might be nice to clean up some of the heading/bolding to make things a little more cohesive.