Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade atem-connection from 2.4.0 to 2.5.0 #12

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

robere2
Copy link
Member

@robere2 robere2 commented Aug 29, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade atem-connection from 2.4.0 to 2.5.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2023-08-08.
Release notes
Package name: atem-connection
  • 2.5.0 - 2023-08-08

    chore(release): 2.5.0

  • 2.4.0 - 2021-11-15
from atem-connection GitHub release notes

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #12 (948a988) into master (e95ce53) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #12   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.40%   74.40%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         547      547           
  Branches       64       64           
=======================================
  Hits          407      407           
  Misses        140      140           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants