Bump the minimally support sequoia-openpgp version.

[nwalfield]

• Bump the minimally support sequoia-openpgp version to 1.21.1.

[github-actions]

* 7d1748f957320ad07307ae805e6ed0b5ad045d55 Bump the minimally support sequoia-openpgp version.
|   - Authorized by Neal H. Walfield <[email protected]> [74E445BA0E15C957]
* 739a606da6ea1e836a415a1fd7899f36b7fd5a38 Release 1.6.0.
    - Trust root.

The pull request's base (739a606) authenticates the pull request's head (7d1748f).

[nwalfield]

@pmatilai, @dmnks: Can you please confirm that this failure is benign

  --- -	2024-07-08 20:25:03.887142823 +0000
  +++ /home/runner/work/rpm-sequoia/rpm-sequoia/rpm-build/tests/rpmtests.dir/at-groups/273/stdout	2024-07-08 20:25:03.882178157 +0000
  @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
  -SHA256HEADER: eb512d3d8c282d0249701032591c53ffb5904c54c95de04783028387b224d8fe
  -SHA1HEADER: a42c611d67870c1937623f0da2631eabdf33e948
  -SIGMD5: 88d1037686ed3f5f6b67618b02cc47ef
  -PAYLOADDIGEST: 116ce41ebb72f1877cda3d7dedaf5b78770e202d6389ade4e415d78548d703a8
  -PAYLOADDIGESTALT: 116ce41ebb72f1877cda3d7dedaf5b78770e202d6389ade4e415d78548d703a8
  +SHA256HEADER: 94d13620f7058c14f24605c1461a9ef89b5b50b80c421a0a0eb7f0c62fe0f638
  +SHA1HEADER: 8036a9b66aa7781e4000a441e695bb076acfc450
  +SIGMD5: 98d3343d19052974392ed389e121f4f8
  +PAYLOADDIGEST: 91438332ac8fe92e4d4fcd45edb64b659323b893d9496a339f8587d19d00531a
  +PAYLOADDIGESTALT: 91438332ac8fe92e4d4fcd45edb64b659323b893d9496a339f8587d19d00531a
   /build/RPMS/noarch/attrtest-1.0-1.noarch.rpm:
       Header SHA256 digest: OK
       Header SHA1 digest: OK
  273. rpmsigdig.at:157: 273. rpmkeys -Kv <unsigned> 2 (rpmsigdig.at:157): FAILED (rpmsigdig.at:159)

[dmnks]

This looks a lot like (unfixed?) rpm-software-management/rpm#2874. Is this with rpm's master branch?

[dmnks]

Either way, this is probably some distro specifics leaking into the binary packages when they're built. We hardcode these hashes in the test suite and they're generated on Fedora. So this is most likely benign, indeed.

[nwalfield]

This looks a lot like (unfixed?) rpm-software-management/rpm#2874. Is this with rpm's master branch?

Ha, I forgot about that issue. This looks like the same benign failure (different check sums on a different OS).

To answer your question: no we decided to not upgrade rpm-sequoia's CI, but leave it at 4.18 on Ubuntu for now.

[nwalfield]

/fast-forward

[dmnks]

Ack, thanks. Looking at 4.18.2, it does include the commit that was supposed to fix this (rpm-software-management/rpm@7ec148c) so apparently it wasn't the complete fix then. That would also explain why the ticket is still open, too 😄