This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 30, 2024. It is now read-only.
docs: Add example of proc being acceptable as filter in config.include #3112
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks this is documented in our feature docs but doesn't hurt to include here |
|
Thanks again |
|
Thank you for reviewing and merge @JonRowe 🎉 |
JonRowe
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2024
docs: Add example of proc being acceptable as filter in config.include
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reading through this issue discussion, I learned that Procs can be used as filters metadata.
In this PR, I am adding an example of using a Proc with the
config.includemethod and the:typefilter accepting proc as a value.