Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: formatting changes #3002

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

chore: formatting changes #3002

merged 29 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

sanpj2292
Copy link
Contributor

@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 commented Jan 19, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

  • We are using prettier separately
  • If the PR raised doesn't follow the prettier/eslint standards, there is a verify action introduced which would fail the PR

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-1499

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 self-assigned this Jan 19, 2024
@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 requested review from a team and sivashanmukh as code owners January 19, 2024 02:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.07692% with 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.70%. Comparing base (9afcd7b) to head (37d3e80).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Files Patch % Lines
src/util/customTransformer.js 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/util/stats.js 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/util/customTransformer-v1.js 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/util/customTransformerFactory.js 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/util/ivmFactory.js 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3002      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.59%   84.70%   +0.10%     
===========================================
  Files          493      494       +1     
  Lines        27308    27274      -34     
  Branches      6576     6554      -22     
===========================================
+ Hits         23101    23102       +1     
+ Misses        3754     3719      -35     
  Partials       453      453              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sai Sankeerth added 2 commits January 19, 2024 08:57
…ormat && lint:fix, apply prettier changes

Signed-off-by: Sai Sankeerth <[email protected]>
@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 19, 2024 13:04
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

1 similar comment
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Sai Sankeerth added 2 commits January 22, 2024 12:42
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2024
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Sai Sankeerth <[email protected]>
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 requested a review from koladilip February 2, 2024 05:48
koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Feb 5, 2024
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Sai Sankeerth added 2 commits February 16, 2024 17:35
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Feb 16, 2024
koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Feb 20, 2024
koladilip
koladilip previously approved these changes Feb 21, 2024
krishna2020
krishna2020 previously approved these changes Feb 22, 2024
Copy link

@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 merged commit 108cbba into develop Feb 26, 2024
16 checks passed
@sanpj2292 sanpj2292 deleted the chore.format-standard branch February 26, 2024 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants