Fix(Multichain): validate account data

[schmanu]

What it solves

Validates the safeAccountConfig of counterfactual Safes as well.

How to test it

• Try to replay a counterfactual Safe that uses a payment or unknown to address.

Checklist

• I've tested the branch on mobile 📱
• I've documented how it affects the analytics (if at all) 📊
• I've written a unit/e2e test for it (if applicable) 🧑‍💻

[github-actions]

Branch preview

✅ Deploy successful!

Website:
https://fix_validate_account_data--walletweb.review.5afe.dev/home?safe=eth:0xA77DE01e157f9f57C7c4A326eeE9C4874D0598b6

Storybook:
https://fix_validate_account_data--walletweb.review.5afe.dev/storybook/

[notion-workspace]

Add contract checks when adding network to a safe

[github-actions]

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for safe-wallet-web

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

⚠️ Global Bundle Size Increased

Page	Size (compressed)
global	987.29 KB (🟡 +26.19 KB)

Details

The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!

Fifteen Pages Changed Size

The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:

Page	Size (compressed)	First Load
/	511 B (🟢 -24.37 KB)	987.79 KB
/address-book	26.09 KB (🟡 +5 B)	1013.38 KB
/apps/open	53.09 KB (-1 B)	1.02 MB
/balances	29.42 KB (🟢 -1.52 KB)	1016.71 KB
/balances/nfts	19.18 KB (-1 B)	1006.47 KB
/home	57.22 KB (🟢 -923 B)	1.02 MB
/new-safe/advanced-create	36.49 KB (🟡 +1.36 KB)	1023.78 KB
/new-safe/create	35.75 KB (🟡 +1.36 KB)	1023.04 KB
/new-safe/load	16.41 KB (🟡 +6 B)	1003.7 KB
/settings/modules	9.82 KB (🟡 +38 B)	997.11 KB
/settings/notifications	27.03 KB (-2 B)	1014.32 KB
/settings/setup	35.98 KB (🟡 +5 B)	1023.27 KB
/transactions/tx	21.07 KB (-2 B)	1008.36 KB
/welcome	6.8 KB (🟢 -1 B)	994.09 KB
/welcome/accounts	379 B (🟢 -1 B)	987.66 KB

Details

Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.

First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

Next to the size is how much the size has increased or decreased compared with the base branch of this PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this.

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	77.96% (+0.01% 🔼)	12364/15860
🔴	Branches	58.26% (+0.02% 🔼)	3233/5549
🟡	Functions	65.19% (+0.01% 🔼)	1944/2982
🟡	Lines	79.46% (+0.01% 🔼)	11158/14042

Test suite run success

1543 tests passing in 205 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from bff3fbd

[usame-algan]

Out of scope here but I wonder if we need this nested try catch structure inside useSafeCreationData. If there is an error for one of the chains, shouldn't it already propagate to the outer catch where we log the _816 error?

[schmanu]

The idea is to retry it with other chains if a Safe is deployed on other chains already. Gnosis Chain does not work in most cases for instance.