Pushing the docs to dev/ for branch: main, commit 2ab1d81e167512719b6…

…272d4ddf286bba5d3d232
scikit-learn · Jul 6, 2023 · b9c10ef · b9c10ef
1 parent eac27b1
commit b9c10ef
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 1,318 changed files with 7,336 additions and 7,346 deletions.
diff --git a/dev/.buildinfo b/dev/.buildinfo
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 # Sphinx build info version 1
 # This file hashes the configuration used when building these files. When it is not found, a full rebuild will be done.
-config: 5666cdbb9feecb64a77744ef7bf93ba6
+config: 5c879347b182b3b40f0311234ff7c36a
 tags: 645f666f9bcd5a90fca523b33c5a78b7
diff --git a/dev/_downloads/07fcc19ba03226cd3d83d4e40ec44385/auto_examples_python.zip b/dev/_downloads/07fcc19ba03226cd3d83d4e40ec44385/auto_examples_python.zip
diff --git a/dev/_downloads/6f1e7a639e0699d6164445b55e6c116d/auto_examples_jupyter.zip b/dev/_downloads/6f1e7a639e0699d6164445b55e6c116d/auto_examples_jupyter.zip
diff --git a/dev/_downloads/scikit-learn-docs.zip b/dev/_downloads/scikit-learn-docs.zip
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_004.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_004.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_agglomerative_clustering_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_anomaly_comparison_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_anomaly_comparison_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_anomaly_comparison_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_anomaly_comparison_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_caching_nearest_neighbors_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_caching_nearest_neighbors_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_caching_nearest_neighbors_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_caching_nearest_neighbors_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_cluster_comparison_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_cluster_comparison_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_cluster_comparison_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_cluster_comparison_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_coin_segmentation_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_compare_calibration_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_compare_calibration_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_compare_calibration_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_compare_calibration_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_dict_face_patches_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_dict_face_patches_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_dict_face_patches_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_dict_face_patches_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_digits_pipe_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_digits_pipe_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_digits_pipe_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_digits_pipe_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_classification_20newsgroups_005.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_classification_20newsgroups_005.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_classification_20newsgroups_006.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_classification_20newsgroups_006.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_clustering_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_clustering_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_clustering_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_document_clustering_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gmm_init_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gmm_init_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gmm_init_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gmm_init_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_categorical_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_early_stopping_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_gradient_boosting_early_stopping_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_hashing_vs_dict_vectorizer_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_image_denoising_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_image_denoising_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_image_denoising_005.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_image_denoising_005.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_approximation_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_approximation_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_approximation_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_approximation_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_kernel_ridge_regression_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lasso_model_selection_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lasso_model_selection_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lasso_model_selection_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lasso_model_selection_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_learning_curve_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_learning_curve_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_learning_curve_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_learning_curve_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linear_model_coefficient_interpretation_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linear_model_coefficient_interpretation_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linear_model_coefficient_interpretation_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linear_model_coefficient_interpretation_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linkage_comparison_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linkage_comparison_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linkage_comparison_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_linkage_comparison_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_004.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_004.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_005.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_005.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_006.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_006.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_007.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_007.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_008.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_008.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_009.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_009.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_010.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_010.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_011.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_011.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_012.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_012.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_013.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_013.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_014.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_lle_digits_014.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_manifold_sphere_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_manifold_sphere_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_manifold_sphere_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_manifold_sphere_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_mini_batch_kmeans_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_mini_batch_kmeans_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_mini_batch_kmeans_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_mini_batch_kmeans_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_model_complexity_influence_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_004.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_out_of_core_classification_004.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_003.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_003.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_004.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_004.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_prediction_latency_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_release_highlights_0_24_0_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_release_highlights_0_24_0_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_release_highlights_0_24_0_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_release_highlights_0_24_0_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_scalable_poly_kernels_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_scalable_poly_kernels_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_scalable_poly_kernels_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_scalable_poly_kernels_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sgd_early_stopping_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sgd_early_stopping_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sparse_logistic_regression_20newsgroups_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sparse_logistic_regression_20newsgroups_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sparse_logistic_regression_20newsgroups_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_sparse_logistic_regression_20newsgroups_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_stack_predictors_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_stack_predictors_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_stack_predictors_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_stack_predictors_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_successive_halving_heatmap_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_successive_halving_heatmap_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_successive_halving_heatmap_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_successive_halving_heatmap_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_001.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_001.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_thumb.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_theilsen_thumb.png
diff --git a/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_ward_structured_vs_unstructured_002.png b/dev/_images/sphx_glr_plot_ward_structured_vs_unstructured_002.png
diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_cyclical_feature_engineering.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_cyclical_feature_engineering.rst.txt
@@ -2555,7 +2555,7 @@ instead of `RidgeCV`.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  14.353 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  12.607 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_cyclical_feature_engineering.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_digits_denoising.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_digits_denoising.rst.txt
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ will depend of the parameters `n_components`, `gamma`, and `alpha`.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  10.202 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  9.947 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_digits_denoising.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_face_recognition.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_face_recognition.rst.txt
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ dataset): unsupervised feature extraction / dimensionality reduction
  .. code-block:: none
 
     Extracting the top 150 eigenfaces from 966 faces
-    done in 0.071s
+    done in 0.075s
     Projecting the input data on the eigenfaces orthonormal basis
     done in 0.008s
 
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Train a SVM classification model
  .. code-block:: none
 
     Fitting the classifier to the training set
-    done in 5.599s
+    done in 5.973s
     Best estimator found by grid search:
     SVC(C=76823.03433306453, class_weight='balanced', gamma=0.003418945823095797)
 
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ Quantitative evaluation of the model quality on the test set
  .. code-block:: none
 
     Predicting people's names on the test set
-    done in 0.044s
+    done in 0.045s
                        precision    recall  f1-score   support
 
          Ariel Sharon       0.75      0.69      0.72        13
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ tensorflow to implement such models.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  6.474 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  6.912 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_face_recognition.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_model_complexity_influence.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_model_complexity_influence.rst.txt
@@ -388,49 +388,49 @@ ensemble is not as detrimental.
 
     Benchmarking SGDClassifier(alpha=0.001, l1_ratio=0.25, loss='modified_huber',
                   n_iter_no_change=2, penalty='elasticnet', tol=0.1)
-    Complexity: 4948 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.2675 | Pred. Time: 0.065908s
+    Complexity: 4948 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.2675 | Pred. Time: 0.056985s
 
     Benchmarking SGDClassifier(alpha=0.001, l1_ratio=0.5, loss='modified_huber',
                   n_iter_no_change=2, penalty='elasticnet', tol=0.1)
-    Complexity: 1847 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3264 | Pred. Time: 0.046188s
+    Complexity: 1847 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3264 | Pred. Time: 0.046402s
 
     Benchmarking SGDClassifier(alpha=0.001, l1_ratio=0.75, loss='modified_huber',
                   n_iter_no_change=2, penalty='elasticnet', tol=0.1)
-    Complexity: 997 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3383 | Pred. Time: 0.036153s
+    Complexity: 997 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3383 | Pred. Time: 0.038430s
 
     Benchmarking SGDClassifier(alpha=0.001, l1_ratio=0.9, loss='modified_huber',
                   n_iter_no_change=2, penalty='elasticnet', tol=0.1)
-    Complexity: 802 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3582 | Pred. Time: 0.032861s
+    Complexity: 802 | Hamming Loss (Misclassification Ratio): 0.3582 | Pred. Time: 0.034691s
 
     Benchmarking NuSVR(C=1000.0, gamma=3.0517578125e-05, nu=0.05)
-    Complexity: 18 | MSE: 5558.7313 | Pred. Time: 0.000195s
+    Complexity: 18 | MSE: 5558.7313 | Pred. Time: 0.000179s
 
     Benchmarking NuSVR(C=1000.0, gamma=3.0517578125e-05, nu=0.1)
-    Complexity: 36 | MSE: 5289.8022 | Pred. Time: 0.000357s
+    Complexity: 36 | MSE: 5289.8022 | Pred. Time: 0.000260s
 
     Benchmarking NuSVR(C=1000.0, gamma=3.0517578125e-05, nu=0.2)
-    Complexity: 72 | MSE: 5193.8353 | Pred. Time: 0.000469s
+    Complexity: 72 | MSE: 5193.8353 | Pred. Time: 0.000452s
 
     Benchmarking NuSVR(C=1000.0, gamma=3.0517578125e-05, nu=0.35)
-    Complexity: 124 | MSE: 5131.3279 | Pred. Time: 0.000655s
+    Complexity: 124 | MSE: 5131.3279 | Pred. Time: 0.000684s
 
     Benchmarking NuSVR(C=1000.0, gamma=3.0517578125e-05)
-    Complexity: 178 | MSE: 5149.0779 | Pred. Time: 0.000891s
+    Complexity: 178 | MSE: 5149.0779 | Pred. Time: 0.000956s
 
     Benchmarking GradientBoostingRegressor(learning_rate=0.05, max_depth=2, n_estimators=10)
-    Complexity: 10 | MSE: 4066.4812 | Pred. Time: 0.000159s
+    Complexity: 10 | MSE: 4066.4812 | Pred. Time: 0.000304s
 
     Benchmarking GradientBoostingRegressor(learning_rate=0.05, max_depth=2, n_estimators=25)
-    Complexity: 25 | MSE: 3551.1723 | Pred. Time: 0.000191s
+    Complexity: 25 | MSE: 3551.1723 | Pred. Time: 0.000184s
 
     Benchmarking GradientBoostingRegressor(learning_rate=0.05, max_depth=2, n_estimators=50)
-    Complexity: 50 | MSE: 3445.2171 | Pred. Time: 0.000221s
+    Complexity: 50 | MSE: 3445.2171 | Pred. Time: 0.000245s
 
     Benchmarking GradientBoostingRegressor(learning_rate=0.05, max_depth=2, n_estimators=75)
-    Complexity: 75 | MSE: 3433.0358 | Pred. Time: 0.000251s
+    Complexity: 75 | MSE: 3433.0358 | Pred. Time: 0.000282s
 
     Benchmarking GradientBoostingRegressor(learning_rate=0.05, max_depth=2)
-    Complexity: 100 | MSE: 3456.0602 | Pred. Time: 0.000526s
+    Complexity: 100 | MSE: 3456.0602 | Pred. Time: 0.000282s
 
 
 
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ under-fitting or over-fitting.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  5.436 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  5.269 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_model_complexity_influence.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_out_of_core_classification.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_out_of_core_classification.rst.txt
@@ -383,46 +383,46 @@ maximum
  .. code-block:: none
 
     Test set is 878 documents (108 positive)
-                     SGD classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.915 in 0.66s ( 1467 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.855 in 0.66s ( 1460 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.877 in 0.67s ( 1438 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.933 in 0.67s ( 1431 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.915 in 0.61s ( 1568 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.855 in 0.62s ( 1553 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.877 in 0.64s ( 1500 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :          962 train docs (   132 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.933 in 0.64s ( 1493 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.938 in 2.01s ( 1946 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.936 in 2.01s ( 1941 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.885 in 2.03s ( 1928 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.941 in 2.03s ( 1925 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.938 in 1.78s ( 2195 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.936 in 1.78s ( 2191 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.885 in 1.79s ( 2181 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         3911 train docs (   517 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.941 in 1.80s ( 2177 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 3.34s ( 2043 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 3.34s ( 2041 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.900 in 3.35s ( 2036 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.953 in 3.35s ( 2034 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 2.90s ( 2349 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 2.91s ( 2346 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.900 in 2.92s ( 2338 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         6821 train docs (   891 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.953 in 2.92s ( 2336 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.949 in 4.83s ( 2019 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.953 in 4.84s ( 2018 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.909 in 4.84s ( 2014 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.958 in 4.85s ( 2013 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.949 in 4.04s ( 2413 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.953 in 4.05s ( 2411 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.909 in 4.05s ( 2406 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :         9759 train docs (  1276 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.958 in 4.06s ( 2405 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.944 in 5.89s ( 1983 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.956 in 5.89s ( 1982 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.915 in 5.90s ( 1979 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.950 in 5.91s ( 1977 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.944 in 5.01s ( 2330 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.956 in 5.01s ( 2329 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.915 in 5.02s ( 2325 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        11680 train docs (  1499 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.950 in 5.03s ( 2324 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.965 in 7.18s ( 2037 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.903 in 7.18s ( 2036 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.924 in 7.19s ( 2034 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.957 in 7.19s ( 2033 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.965 in 6.16s ( 2375 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.903 in 6.16s ( 2374 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.924 in 6.17s ( 2371 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        14625 train docs (  1865 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.957 in 6.17s ( 2370 docs/s)
 
 
-                     SGD classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.957 in 8.32s ( 2087 docs/s)
-              Perceptron classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.933 in 8.32s ( 2086 docs/s)
-          NB Multinomial classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.932 in 8.33s ( 2083 docs/s)
-      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 8.34s ( 2082 docs/s)
+                     SGD classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.957 in 7.19s ( 2413 docs/s)
+              Perceptron classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.933 in 7.20s ( 2412 docs/s)
+          NB Multinomial classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.932 in 7.20s ( 2410 docs/s)
+      Passive-Aggressive classifier :        17360 train docs (  2179 positive)    878 test docs (   108 positive) accuracy: 0.952 in 7.21s ( 2409 docs/s)
 
 
 
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ before feeding them to the learner.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  9.346 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  8.128 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_out_of_core_classification.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_outlier_detection_wine.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_outlier_detection_wine.rst.txt
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ the data scatter matrix and the risk of over-fitting the data.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  1.322 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  1.277 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_outlier_detection_wine.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_prediction_latency.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_prediction_latency.rst.txt
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ Benchmark throughput
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  16.815 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  15.880 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_prediction_latency.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_species_distribution_modeling.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_species_distribution_modeling.rst.txt
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ References
 
      Area under the ROC curve : 0.993919
 
-    time elapsed: 7.64s
+    time elapsed: 6.46s
 
 
 
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ References
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  7.841 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  6.652 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_species_distribution_modeling.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_stock_market.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_stock_market.rst.txt
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ axis.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  3.931 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  7.145 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_stock_market.py:

diff --git a/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_tomography_l1_reconstruction.rst.txt b/dev/_sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_tomography_l1_reconstruction.rst.txt
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ contributed to fewer projections than the central disk.
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  9.490 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  9.655 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_tomography_l1_reconstruction.py:

diff --git a/..._sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_topics_extraction_with_nmf_lda.rst.txt b/..._sources/auto_examples/applications/plot_topics_extraction_with_nmf_lda.rst.txt
@@ -86,30 +86,30 @@ proportional to (n_samples * iterations).
  .. code-block:: none
 
     Loading dataset...
-    done in 1.276s.
+    done in 1.110s.
     Extracting tf-idf features for NMF...
-    done in 0.310s.
+    done in 0.238s.
     Extracting tf features for LDA...
-    done in 0.315s.
+    done in 0.230s.
 
     Fitting the NMF model (Frobenius norm) with tf-idf features, n_samples=2000 and n_features=1000...
-    done in 0.094s.
+    done in 0.072s.
 
 
      Fitting the NMF model (generalized Kullback-Leibler divergence) with tf-idf features, n_samples=2000 and n_features=1000...
-    done in 1.397s.
+    done in 1.212s.
 
 
      Fitting the MiniBatchNMF model (Frobenius norm) with tf-idf features, n_samples=2000 and n_features=1000, batch_size=128...
-    done in 0.085s.
+    done in 0.077s.
 
 
      Fitting the MiniBatchNMF model (generalized Kullback-Leibler divergence) with tf-idf features, n_samples=2000 and n_features=1000, batch_size=128...
-    done in 0.222s.
+    done in 0.209s.
 
 
      Fitting LDA models with tf features, n_samples=2000 and n_features=1000...
-    done in 2.059s.
+    done in 1.979s.
 
 
 
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ proportional to (n_samples * iterations).
 
 .. rst-class:: sphx-glr-timing
 
-   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  11.759 seconds)
+   **Total running time of the script:** ( 0 minutes  10.769 seconds)
 
 
 .. _sphx_glr_download_auto_examples_applications_plot_topics_extraction_with_nmf_lda.py: