Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCITT Usage Examples #46

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

SteveLasker
Copy link
Collaborator

The beginning of a collection of use cases, with examples how SCITT is used to support them.

The first one captures the binary use case, where multiple versions are concurrently supported.
How would a SCITT Feed support this scenario?

Addresses: Refine Definition of Feed #11

examples/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/feed-binary-usecase.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/feed-binary-usecase.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SteveLasker and others added 4 commits September 25, 2023 22:12
Co-authored-by: Jon Geater <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jon Geater <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jon Geater <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: steve lasker <[email protected]>
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
_config.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: steve lasker <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@aj-stein-nist aj-stein-nist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, I am a recent lurker in this area. I have only minor feedback about typos and such things, I hope this is helpful.

examples/fictitious-companies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/fictitious-companies.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/feed-binary-usecase.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SteveLasker and others added 3 commits September 30, 2023 08:08
Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: A.J. Stein <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
@SteveLasker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @aj-stein-nist for the feedback and your time.

Signed-off-by: steve lasker <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@OR13 OR13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SteveLasker please merge or dismiss @henkbirkholz 's suggestions, then I will approve again.

SteveLasker and others added 3 commits October 9, 2023 10:07
Co-authored-by: Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henk Birkholz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
@SteveLasker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@SteveLasker please merge or dismiss @henkbirkholz 's suggestions, then I will approve again.

Thanks, @OR13, merged the actionable ones, and replied to the questions.

@OR13 OR13 self-requested a review October 9, 2023 17:53
Copy link
Collaborator

@OR13 OR13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reviewed again, there seems to be confusion regarding mangement of this repo, vs iETF work items, code owners have the ability to merge PRs here, IETF consenus is not required.

I'd like to see mandatory reviews from code owners, and I will approve after all threads are marked resolved.

@SteveLasker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I reviewed again, there seems to be confusion regarding mangement of this repo, vs iETF work items, code owners have the ability to merge PRs here, IETF consenus is not required.

Correct, this is the SCITT Community, which supports the IETF SCITT specs, but is a more diverse group.
See SCITT Community

@SteveLasker SteveLasker merged commit 6972941 into scitt-community:main Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants