Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put providers.tf & required_providers.tf to each app folder #238

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

zzaakiirr
Copy link
Contributor

@zzaakiirr zzaakiirr commented Oct 22, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR:

  1. Generates providers.tf terraform configuration and saves it to each app folder
  2. Moves required_providers.tf (previously named providers.tf) from root directory to app folder

Screenshots

Previous version
378858965-30850b4d-b8b8-4453-9788-2a30c6aa8d9e

Current version
378858552-cfd1d278-8419-42e5-8ccb-39f03703959f

Generated terraform config

terraform.zip

@zzaakiirr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to the Generate class within the Command::Terraform module, streamlining the configuration generation process. The call method has been updated to integrate logic previously handled by the removed generate_common_configs and generate_app_configs methods. New methods for generating required provider configurations have been added. Additionally, a new Provider class has been introduced, and modifications have been made to the RequiredProvider class. The test suite has been refactored for improved organization and clarity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
lib/command/terraform/generate.rb - Removed methods: generate_common_configs, generate_app_configs.
- Added methods: generate_required_providers, generate_providers.
- Updated call method to integrate app config logic.
lib/core/terraform_config/provider.rb - Added Provider class with methods: initialize, to_tf, and attribute readers for name, options.
lib/core/terraform_config/required_provider.rb - Modified to_tf method to include a new cloud block with an organization argument.
spec/command/terraform/generate_spec.rb - Refactored tests to use shared examples.
- Renamed config_file_paths to all_config_paths.
- Added methods: provider_config_paths, template_config_paths, config_path.
spec/core/terraform_config/provider_spec.rb - Added tests for TerraformConfig::Provider class, specifically for the #to_tf method.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

changes requested

Suggested reviewers

  • borela
  • rafaelgomesxyz

Poem

In the land of Terraform, we hop and play,
Configs and providers, all in a day!
With methods refined and tests that shine,
Our bunny hearts leap, oh how divine!
From common configs to providers anew,
Hooray for the changes, we dance with the crew! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
lib/core/terraform_config/provider.rb (3)

7-12: LGTM: Initialize method is well-structured. Consider adding documentation.

The initialize method correctly sets up the Provider instance with a name and options. The call to super() is appropriate if the Base class has its own initialization logic.

Consider adding a comment or documentation for this method to explain its purpose and parameters, especially the options hash.


14-20: LGTM: to_tf method correctly generates Terraform provider block. Consider adding error handling.

The to_tf method effectively generates a Terraform provider block using what appears to be a custom DSL. It correctly iterates over the options hash to add arguments to the provider block.

Consider adding error handling for cases where options might be nil or empty, or where the block or argument methods might fail. For example:

def to_tf
  raise ArgumentError, "Provider name cannot be empty" if name.to_s.empty?
  
  block :provider, name do
    options&.each do |option, value|
      argument option, value
    end
  end
rescue => e
  raise "Failed to generate Terraform provider block: #{e.message}"
end

1-22: Overall, the Provider class is well-implemented and fits its purpose.

The Provider class in this file is well-structured and implements the necessary functionality to represent and generate Terraform provider configurations. It follows good Ruby practices and integrates well with what seems to be a custom DSL for Terraform config generation.

A few suggestions for further improvement:

  1. Add class and method documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this class.
  2. Consider adding more robust error handling, especially in the to_tf method.
  3. If not already present, consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of this class, particularly the to_tf method with various input scenarios.

Ensure that this Provider class is well-integrated with the rest of the Terraform configuration generation system. It might be beneficial to create a comprehensive guide or documentation that explains how all the pieces fit together in generating Terraform configurations.

spec/core/terraform_config/provider_spec.rb (2)

8-13: LGTM: Well-structured test context and setup.

The test context is well-defined and focuses on a specific use case. The use of subject(:generated) and let for setting up the provider name and options is a good practice for clarity and flexibility.

Consider adding more test cases in the future to cover different providers or option combinations.


15-23: LGTM: Clear and concise test case.

The test case is well-written and uses a heredoc for improved readability of the expected output. The expected configuration matches Terraform's style guide.

Consider using RSpec's expect(...).to eq(...) with a custom error message to provide more context if the test fails. For example:

expect(generated).to eq(expected_output), "Generated Terraform configuration does not match expected output"

This can help in quickly identifying issues if the test fails in the future.

spec/command/terraform/generate_spec.rb (2)

39-48: Well-structured shared example for error cases!

This shared example effectively covers the negative case where no config files should be generated. The use of ExitCode::ERROR_DEFAULT is consistent with the previous example's use of constants.

One minor suggestion:

Consider adding a check for the result[:stdout] to ensure it's empty or contains expected content in error cases. This could provide more comprehensive coverage of the command's behavior.


98-104: Well-structured methods for config paths

The provider_config_paths and template_config_paths methods provide a clear separation of concerns and make the code more maintainable. The use of map with config_path is a concise and readable approach.

Consider extracting the hardcoded filenames into constants or configuration files. This would make it easier to update or extend the list of config files in the future without modifying the method implementations.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40aba4c and 13be897.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • lib/command/terraform/generate.rb (2 hunks)
  • lib/core/terraform_config/provider.rb (1 hunks)
  • lib/core/terraform_config/required_provider.rb (1 hunks)
  • spec/command/terraform/generate_spec.rb (3 hunks)
  • spec/core/terraform_config/provider_spec.rb (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
lib/core/terraform_config/provider.rb (1)

1-5: LGTM: Class structure and attribute readers are well-defined.

The Provider class is appropriately defined within the TerraformConfig module and inherits from Base. The attribute readers for name and options provide proper access to the instance variables.

lib/core/terraform_config/required_provider.rb (1)

16-18: ⚠️ Potential issue

Replace the placeholder value for the organization.

The newly added cloud block introduces Terraform Cloud configuration, which is a significant change. However, the organization argument is set to a placeholder value.

Replace "PLACEHOLDER" with the actual organization name or implement a mechanism to dynamically set this value. For example:

argument :organization, ENV['TERRAFORM_CLOUD_ORGANIZATION'] || raise("Terraform Cloud organization not set")

This ensures that a valid organization is always provided and fails early if it's not set.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, let's verify its usage:

spec/core/terraform_config/provider_spec.rb (1)

1-6: LGTM: File structure and test setup.

The file structure follows RSpec best practices. The use of let for config setup is a good practice for reusability and readability.

spec/command/terraform/generate_spec.rb (5)

27-37: Great job on introducing the shared example!

The new shared example "generates terraform config files" improves code reusability and readability. It's flexible enough to handle different configurations of expected paths and error messages, which is excellent for maintaining DRY principles in your test suite.

The use of ExitCode::SUCCESS instead of hardcoded values is a good practice that enhances maintainability.


50-52: Excellent refactoring of test cases!

The use of shared examples across different test scenarios significantly improves the consistency and maintainability of the test suite. By using let for expected_config_paths and err_msg, you've made each test case flexible and easy to understand.

This refactoring:

  1. Reduces code duplication
  2. Improves readability
  3. Makes it easier to add new test cases in the future

Great job on improving the overall structure of the test suite!

Also applies to: 62-64, 73-75, 82-83, 91-91


94-96: Good addition of the all_config_paths method

This method provides a clean and modular way to combine all configuration paths. It enhances readability and maintains separation of concerns by delegating to provider_config_paths and template_config_paths.


106-108: Excellent addition of the config_path method

This method centralizes the logic for constructing config file paths, which promotes consistency and reduces the chance of errors. It's simple, focused, and adheres to the Single Responsibility Principle.

The use of TERRAFORM_CONFIG_DIR_PATH and app variables ensures that the paths are constructed correctly within the context of the test environment.


Line range hint 1-108: Overall excellent refactoring and improvements

The changes to this test file significantly enhance its structure, readability, and maintainability. The introduction of shared examples reduces code duplication and makes the test cases more consistent. The new methods for handling config paths improve modularity and make the code more robust.

Key improvements:

  1. Use of shared examples for common test scenarios
  2. Clear separation of provider and template config paths
  3. Centralized logic for constructing config file paths
  4. Improved use of constants for exit codes

These changes will make it easier to maintain and extend the test suite in the future. Great job on this refactoring effort!

lib/command/terraform/generate.rb (3)

25-26: Ensure private methods are correctly encapsulated

By adding private, the methods below are now private. Verify that these methods are not intended to be accessed from outside the Generate class. If they need to be accessed externally or by subclasses, consider using protected or keeping them public.


54-54: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify that config.org is always provided

The generate_providers method uses config.org without checking if it is present. If config.org is nil, it might lead to unexpected behavior or errors in the generated providers.tf file. Ensure that config.org is validated before use.

Add a check for config.org:

 def generate_providers(terraform_app_dir)
+  unless config.org
+    Shell.abort("Organization is not specified in the configuration.")
+  end
   cpln_provider = TerraformConfig::Provider.new("cpln", org: config.org)
   File.write(terraform_app_dir.join("providers.tf"), cpln_provider.to_tf)
 end

Alternatively, provide a default value or handle the nil case appropriately.


20-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid using instance_variable_set for setting @app

Using instance_variable_set can lead to unintended side effects and makes the code harder to maintain. Consider using a proper setter method or accessor to set @app directly.

Apply this diff to use an attribute writer:

- config.instance_variable_set(:@app, app.to_s)
+ config.app = app.to_s
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: zzaakiirr
PR: shakacode/control-plane-flow#230
File: lib/command/terraform/generate.rb:41-43
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:53:47.076Z
Learning: In this codebase, the `config` object's `app` value should not be settable via an attribute. Instead, in special cases, it's acceptable to redefine the `app` method dynamically using `config.class.define_method`.
Learnt from: zzaakiirr
PR: shakacode/control-plane-flow#230
File: lib/command/terraform/generate.rb:41-43
Timestamp: 2024-10-03T12:39:23.185Z
Learning: In this codebase, the `config` object's `app` value should not be settable via an attribute. Instead, in special cases, it's acceptable to redefine the `app` method dynamically using `config.class.define_method`.

lib/core/terraform_config/required_provider.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/core/terraform_config/provider_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/command/terraform/generate.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/command/terraform/generate.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@zzaakiirr zzaakiirr force-pushed the fix-terraform-provider-configs branch from 13be897 to 63dda9a Compare October 22, 2024 13:30
@zzaakiirr zzaakiirr marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 14:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@rafaelgomesxyz rafaelgomesxyz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

lib/core/terraform_config/required_provider.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@zzaakiirr zzaakiirr merged commit 288046a into terraform-feature Oct 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@zzaakiirr zzaakiirr deleted the fix-terraform-provider-configs branch October 23, 2024 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants