Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase code coverage #23

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Increase code coverage #23

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

pedrinlopes
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedrinlopes pedrinlopes commented Jul 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a .ruby-version file to ensure consistent Ruby version usage across development and deployment environments.
  • Tests
    • Added a new test specification for the UberTask::SkipTask functionality to verify proper error handling and task skipping behavior.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new .ruby-version file specifying Ruby version 3.3.4, ensuring consistency across development and deployment environments. Additionally, it adds a specification test for the UberTask::SkipTask functionality, which verifies that tasks are appropriately skipped when specific errors occur, enhancing the robustness of the task execution process.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.ruby-version New file specifying Ruby version 3.3.4 to ensure consistent environment setup.
spec/non_rails/uber_task/task_skipped_on_error_spec.rb New test for UberTask::SkipTask functionality, confirming that tasks are skipped properly on errors.

Poem

In fields of code, where bunnies hop,
A Ruby version now won’t stop.
With tasks that skip on error's gleam,
Our workflow flows like a sweet dream!
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For happy coding throughout the year! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b33ba82 and 4056859.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .ruby-version (1 hunks)
  • spec/non_rails/uber_task/task_skipped_on_error_spec.rb (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .ruby-version
Additional comments not posted (3)
spec/non_rails/uber_task/task_skipped_on_error_spec.rb (3)

1-4: LGTM! Clear test description and initial setup.

The test description and initial setup are clear and concise.


18-19: LGTM! Clear expectation.

The expectation is clear and correctly verifies the test outcome.


20-20: LGTM! Correct test ending.

The test ends correctly.

Comment on lines 5 to 16
UberTask.run do
UberTask.on_subtask_error do |_task, _event, err|
if err.message == 'Some error'
task_skipped_after_exception = true
UberTask.skip(reason: err)
end
end

UberTask.run do
raise 'Some error' if task_skipped_after_exception == false
end
end
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simplify the condition.

The condition if task_skipped_after_exception == false can be simplified to unless task_skipped_after_exception.

-        raise 'Some error' if task_skipped_after_exception == false
+        raise 'Some error' unless task_skipped_after_exception
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
UberTask.run do
UberTask.on_subtask_error do |_task, _event, err|
if err.message == 'Some error'
task_skipped_after_exception = true
UberTask.skip(reason: err)
end
end
UberTask.run do
raise 'Some error' if task_skipped_after_exception == false
end
end
UberTask.run do
UberTask.on_subtask_error do |_task, _event, err|
if err.message == 'Some error'
task_skipped_after_exception = true
UberTask.skip(reason: err)
end
end
UberTask.run do
raise 'Some error' unless task_skipped_after_exception
end
end

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4056859 and b2b3891.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • spec/non_rails/uber_task/task_skipped_on_error_spec.rb (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • spec/non_rails/uber_task/task_skipped_on_error_spec.rb

@borela borela merged commit 20d8cb0 into main Jul 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@borela borela deleted the increase-code-coverage branch July 31, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants