-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: bump alloy
#13
Conversation
Updated `alloy` to version 0.4 along with `once_cell` to 1.20. Incremented package version from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0. Added minor formatting changes in the source files.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/pool_lens.rs (1)
Line range hint
170-196
: Another stellar addition to our cosmic codebase!This function, much like its sibling
get_tick_bitmap_slots
, follows our established patterns with the precision of a Swiss watch. Or should I say, with the accuracy of an atomic clock? Yes, that's more like it.The use of
Vec<PositionKey>
is intriguing. It's like inviting multiple guests to our code party, each with their own unique key. How exciting!However, I have a suggestion that might make this function reach its full potential, like my favorite Flash comic reaching mint condition:
Consider using
&[PositionKey]
instead ofVec<PositionKey>
. This would allow for more flexible use of the function, as it could accept both vectors and slices without unnecessary cloning. It's like upgrading from a regular chess set to a 3D chess set - more options, same game!Here's how you could modify the function signature:
pub async fn get_positions_slots<T, P>( pool: Address, positions: &[PositionKey], provider: P, block_id: Option<BlockId>, ) -> Result<Vec<Slot>, Error>This change would be more efficient and flexible, like my perfectly optimized morning routine. What do you think? Shall we make this upgrade?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Cargo.toml (3 hunks)
- src/pool_lens.rs (2 hunks)
- src/storage_lens.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Cargo.toml (3)
3-3
: Fascinating! A perfectly logical increment in version number.I must say, the meticulous adherence to semantic versioning principles in this update is most satisfactory. It's like watching subatomic particles align in perfect quantum harmony.
26-26
: Bazinga! A minuscule yet significant update!The increment of once_cell from version 1.19 to 1.20 is akin to the precise measurement of a neutrino's mass - small, yet of utmost importance in the grand scheme of things. I applaud your attention to detail in keeping our dependencies as current as my knowledge of particle physics.
14-14
: Ah, the sweet smell of dependency synchronization!The update of the alloy crate from version 0.3 to 0.4 is as harmonious as the vibrations of a perfectly tuned string in string theory. However, as any responsible scientist would do, we must verify that this update doesn't introduce any unforeseen perturbations in our code's space-time continuum.
I propose we run the following test to ensure our code hasn't been thrown into a parallel universe of incompatibility:
Also applies to: 23-23
src/storage_lens.rs (1)
Line range hint
41-47
: Fascinating modification to theStateOverride
instantiation!I must say, this change from
StateOverride::from
toStateOverride::from_iter
is quite intriguing. It's clearly a result of thealloy
dependency update to version 0.4, as mentioned in the pull request objectives. As someone who appreciates precision and adherence to the latest standards, I wholeheartedly approve of this modification.However, I feel compelled to point out that with great change comes great responsibility. We must ensure that this alteration doesn't create a butterfly effect of incompatibility throughout our codebase. It would be prudent to verify that all other occurrences of
StateOverride
creation have been updated accordingly.Allow me to propose a verification process that even Leonard would appreciate:
This script will help us maintain the integrity of our codebase, much like how I maintain the integrity of my spot on the couch.
src/pool_lens.rs (2)
Line range hint
143-169
: Fascinating addition to our codebase!I must say, this function is a prime example of adhering to the established patterns within our module. It's like the way I organize my cereal boxes - everything in its rightful place.
The use of the
#[inline]
attribute is particularly commendable. It's like suggesting to the compiler, "Hey, this function is so important, you might as well memorize it!" Bazinga!
Line range hint
1-196
: Conclusion: A quantum leap for our codebase!These additions to our
pool_lens
module are like discovering a new subatomic particle - they expand our understanding and capabilities in the realm of Uniswap V3 pools.The consistency in style and the adherence to established patterns is more satisfying than a perfectly solved Rubik's cube. It's clear that whoever wrote this code has a beautiful mind, almost rivaling my own. Almost.
Just remember, in the grand scheme of the universe, even the smallest optimization can have ripple effects. So, consider my suggestion about using slices in
get_positions_slots
. It could be the difference between our code running at the speed of light, or merely at the speed of sound.Overall, this PR is more exciting than a new episode of Professor Proton. Bazinga!
Updated
alloy
to version 0.4 along withonce_cell
to 1.20. Incremented package version from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0. Added minor formatting changes in the source files.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
get_tick_bitmap_slots
for retrieving tick bitmap storage slots.get_positions_slots
for fetching storage slots from positions mapping.Updates
alloy
from version 0.3 to 0.4 andonce_cell
from 1.19 to 1.20.Bug Fixes
StateOverride
instances in the storage lens module.Workflow Improvements