-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify what is interpretted as trust anchor for chain #245
Conversation
@woodruffw jsut to check, is it expected that |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
This standardizes client behavior on considering the last certificate in the chain as a trust anchor, regardless if it's a root or intermediate. This means clients should use all preceding CA certificates as chain-builders or intermediates. We do document the case where an intermediate may be issued from multiple roots, specifying that multiple chains should be provided. Another solution for a later PR could be to provide two pools, trusted and untrusted, as an alternative to chains. Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <[email protected]>
38495ca
to
081f498
Compare
Rebased |
I believe so, but CCing @tnytown to confirm 🙂 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
it's data for protobuf reflection so it wouldn't surprise me if it encapsulated these doc changes. we don't use reflective features so it shouldn't matter if this change is included or not :) |
This standardizes client behavior on considering the last certificate in the chain as a trust anchor, regardless if it's a root or intermediate. This means clients should use all preceding CA certificates as chain-builders or intermediates.
We do document the case where an intermediate may be issued from multiple roots, specifying that multiple chains should be provided. Another solution for a later PR could be to provide two pools, trusted and untrusted, as an alternative to chains.
Summary
Release Note
Documentation