Replace require with assert

[nanexcool]

Require has very descriptive error messages, plus returns extra gas... too nice and not shitty enough :)

[JesseAbram]

ok I love it but what if you kept require (I know not as bad on gas) but you used the error messages to make fun of the user? Or just be totally unhelpful

[nanexcool]

I like mocking the user with an error message, but also like taking their gas! Bit more complicated but could have a loop before the require that consumes most of the gas, then trigger the error lol

…

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 7:03 PM JesseAbram ***@***.***> wrote: ok I love it but what if you kept require (I know not as bad on gas) but you used the error messages to make fun of the user? Or just be totally unhelpful — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAM2HQMX7QCAQ7KGUOHLJTT7F2NRANCNFSM5C7HM3BQ> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

[JesseAbram]

I was literally thinking the same thing!

[smartcontracts]

I propose we override require to do a loop to burn the gas

[grGred]

I'm not sure, but it can be done with if revert. Or does it return extra gas?