fix: fix short observation plot #334
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the JSON schema version in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
workflow/resources/datavzrd/spec_short_observations.json (1)
Line range hint 1-45: Overall visualization configuration is robust and well-structured.
The specification maintains a clear visual hierarchy with:
- Appropriate bar chart representation
- Well-defined color scale for evidence levels
- Proper sorting and ordering of categories
- Clear axis titles and tooltips
Consider documenting the color scale choices in a comment to help future maintainers understand the visual design decisions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- workflow/resources/datavzrd/spec_short_observations.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
workflow/resources/datavzrd/spec_short_observations.json (2)
32-43: Fixed tooltip type error correctly.
The change from "nominative" to "nominal" is correct and addresses the type error that was preventing short observation plots from displaying. The tooltip configuration is well-structured with appropriate titles and types.
2-2: Schema version update looks good, but verify compatibility.
The update to Vega-Lite v5 schema is appropriate and aligns with the newer datavzrd wrapper requirements.
Let's verify if the spec uses any deprecated or changed features:
✅ Verification successful
Schema version update is appropriate and safe
The update to Vega-Lite v5 schema is correct and the specification uses compatible features:
- All field types used (
nominal,ordinal,quantitative) are standard Vega-Lite types - The encoding structure follows v5 specifications
- No deprecated or incompatible features are present in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other Vega-Lite specs that might need similar updates
# Search for other Vega-Lite schema declarations
rg -l "schema/vega-lite/v[0-9]" --type json
# Search for potentially incompatible features
rg '"type":\s*"nominative"' --type json
Length of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find JSON files and Vega-Lite schemas
# First, find all JSON files
fd -e json
# Then specifically look at the content of spec_short_observations.json
cat workflow/resources/datavzrd/spec_short_observations.json
# Also check for any other files in datavzrd directory
fd . workflow/resources/datavzrd -e json
Length of output: 1769
|
I will merge this without review as it is a no brainer. :) |
Short observation plots were not shown anymore due to a type error. Somehow this error occurred since updating to a newer datavzrd wrapper version.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes