Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

tests #7

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

davidsiaw
Copy link
Contributor

I attempted to run down a few versions of ruby and found that at 3.0 it gave me this error:

Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/........
fiber-local-1.1.0 requires ruby version >= 3.1, which is incompatible with the current version, ruby
3.0.7p220

This tells me that we are no only 3.1 and above? Or perhaps we need to support a lower version of Ruby by downgrading fiber-local? I'm not sure how to go about this.

Types of Changes

  • Bug fix.
  • New feature.
  • Breaking change.
  • Performance improvement.
  • Maintenance.

Contribution

@davidsiaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing for now other stuff seems broken

@davidsiaw davidsiaw closed this May 27, 2024
@ioquatix
Copy link
Member

My general policy is to drop support for EOL Rubies. Ruby 3.1+ fully supports the fiber scheduler, so I was eager to drop support for 3.0 when it became EOL. As there will no longer be security updates, I also advise you to move to 3.3.1 or at least 3.1+.

@davidsiaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah yeah what I meant was I was trying them out anyway, but if we drop support for 3.1, that does make everything easier. I made a new PR here with most of the stuff fixed #8. I'm not entirely sure how to deal with TruffleRuby or JRuby.

@ioquatix
Copy link
Member

Don't worry about JRuby and TruffleRuby, they are just there for tracking compatibility. I think we will start to see those platforms support the fiber scheduler within the next year or two.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants