Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: [#4684] ESLint issues in botbuilder-dialogs-adaptive-testing #515

Closed

Conversation

sw-joelmut
Copy link

Addresses # 4684
#minor

Description

This PR fixes all the new ESLint errors and warnings that appeared after the ESLint packages' upgrade in the botbuilder-dialogs-adaptive-testing project.

Specific Changes

  • Removed 'only-warn' plugin from 'botbuilder-dialogs-adaptive-testing'.
  • All updated TS and JS files were due to prettier, mocha, and new jsdoc rules.
  • Some values in the ResponseStatusCode enum were skipped with ESLint due to having duplicated values. We added description and group them in the Synonyms section.
  • Some unit tests had their name duplicated, we updated them accordingly.

Testing

The following image shows that there are no more ESLint issues.
image

@sw-joelmut sw-joelmut changed the base branch from southworks/update/eslint-packages to main October 29, 2024 15:34
@sw-joelmut sw-joelmut force-pushed the southworks/fix/botbuilder-dialogs-adaptive-testing branch from 9c646b0 to 7bcfd4b Compare November 14, 2024 18:23
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 14, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12316451001

Details

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 84.625%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12261207668: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 20514
Relevant Lines: 23092

💛 - Coveralls

@sw-joelmut
Copy link
Author

/promoted 4821

@sw-joelmut sw-joelmut closed this Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants