Filter super_diff from rspec backtrace #275
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm unsure if I should add specs to this or not. |
|
It's not easy to test this from within the gem folder itself, as every line in the backtrace will be filtered out. I tested this out on a proof of concept and confirmed that
Thanks @FlorinPopaCodes ! |
jas14
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
Removes the `super_diff` lines from the backtrace as described in #265.
|
Merged in 44d02c7! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the
super_difflines from the backtrace as described in #265.