Merge pull request #300 from splunk/raise_exception_on_malformatted_t…

…ests

Exception on malformatted unit tests in YMLs

contentctl/actions/detection_testing/GitService.py

@@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
 
         #Make a filename to content map
         filepath_to_content_map = { obj.file_path:obj for (_,obj) in self.director.name_to_content_map.items()} 
-        updated_detections:List[Detection] = []
-        updated_macros:List[Macro] = []
-        updated_lookups:List[Lookup] =[]
+        updated_detections:set[Detection] = set()
+        updated_macros:set[Macro] = set()
+        updated_lookups:set[Lookup] = set()
 
         for diff in all_diffs:
             if type(diff) == pygit2.Patch:
@@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
                     if decoded_path.is_relative_to(self.config.path/"detections") and decoded_path.suffix == ".yml":
                         detectionObject = filepath_to_content_map.get(decoded_path, None)
                         if isinstance(detectionObject, Detection):
-                            updated_detections.append(detectionObject)
+                            updated_detections.add(detectionObject)
                         else:
                             raise Exception(f"Error getting detection object for file {str(decoded_path)}")
 
                     elif decoded_path.is_relative_to(self.config.path/"macros") and decoded_path.suffix == ".yml":
                         macroObject = filepath_to_content_map.get(decoded_path, None)
                         if isinstance(macroObject, Macro):
-                            updated_macros.append(macroObject)
+                            updated_macros.add(macroObject)
                         else:
                             raise Exception(f"Error getting macro object for file {str(decoded_path)}")
 
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
                             updatedLookup = filepath_to_content_map.get(decoded_path, None)
                             if not isinstance(updatedLookup,Lookup):
                                 raise Exception(f"Expected {decoded_path} to be type {type(Lookup)}, but instead if was {(type(updatedLookup))}")
-                            updated_lookups.append(updatedLookup)
+                            updated_lookups.add(updatedLookup)
 
                         elif decoded_path.suffix == ".csv":
                             # If the CSV was updated, we want to make sure that we 
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
                         if updatedLookup is not None and updatedLookup not in updated_lookups:
                             # It is possible that both the CSV and YML have been modified for the same lookup,
                             # and we do not want to add it twice. 
-                            updated_lookups.append(updatedLookup)
+                            updated_lookups.add(updatedLookup)
 
                     else:
                         pass
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
 
         # If a detection has at least one dependency on changed content,
         # then we must test it again
-        changed_macros_and_lookups = updated_macros + updated_lookups
+        changed_macros_and_lookups:set[SecurityContentObject] = updated_macros.union(updated_lookups)
 
         for detection in self.director.detections:
             if detection in updated_detections:
@@ -146,14 +146,14 @@ def getChanges(self, target_branch:str)->List[Detection]:
 
             for obj in changed_macros_and_lookups:
                 if obj in detection.get_content_dependencies():
-                   updated_detections.append(detection)
+                   updated_detections.add(detection)
                    break
 
         #Print out the names of all modified/new content
         modifiedAndNewContentString = "\n - ".join(sorted([d.name for d in updated_detections]))
 
         print(f"[{len(updated_detections)}] Pieces of modifed and new content (this may include experimental/deprecated/manual_test content):\n - {modifiedAndNewContentString}")
-        return updated_detections
+        return sorted(list(updated_detections))
 
     def getSelected(self, detectionFilenames: List[FilePath]) -> List[Detection]:
         filepath_to_content_map: dict[FilePath, SecurityContentObject] = {

contentctl/objects/abstract_security_content_objects/detection_abstract.py

@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ def adjust_tests_and_groups(self) -> None:
         the model from the list of unit tests. Also, preemptively skips all manual tests, as well as
         tests for experimental/deprecated detections and Correlation type detections.
         """
+
         # Since ManualTest and UnitTest are not differentiable without looking at the manual_test
         # tag, Pydantic builds all tests as UnitTest objects. If we see the manual_test flag, we
         # convert these to ManualTest
@@ -789,6 +790,45 @@ def search_observables_exist_validate(self):
         # Found everything
         return self
 
+    @field_validator("tests", mode="before")
+    def ensure_yml_test_is_unittest(cls, v:list[dict]):
+        """The typing for the tests field allows it to be one of
+        a number of different types of tests. However, ONLY
+        UnitTest should be allowed to be defined in the YML
+        file.  If part of the UnitTest defined in the YML
+        is incorrect, such as the attack_data file, then
+        it will FAIL to be instantiated as a UnitTest and
+        may instead be instantiated as a different type of
+        test, such as IntegrationTest (since that requires
+        less fields) which is incorrect. Ensure that any
+        raw data read from the YML can actually construct
+        a valid UnitTest and, if not, return errors right
+        away instead of letting Pydantic try to construct
+        it into a different type of test
+
+        Args:
+            v (list[dict]): list of dicts read from the yml. 
+            Each one SHOULD be a valid UnitTest. If we cannot
+            construct a valid unitTest from it, a ValueError should be raised
+
+        Returns:
+            _type_: The input of the function, assuming no 
+            ValueError is raised.
+        """        
+        valueErrors:list[ValueError] = []
+        for unitTest in v:
+            #This raises a ValueError on a failed UnitTest.
+            try:
+                UnitTest.model_validate(unitTest)
+            except ValueError as e:
+                valueErrors.append(e)
+        if len(valueErrors):
+            raise ValueError(valueErrors)
+        # All of these can be constructred as UnitTests with no
+        # Exceptions, so let the normal flow continue
+        return v
+
+
     @field_validator("tests")
     def tests_validate(
         cls,

contentctl/objects/macro.py

@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
     from contentctl.input.director import DirectorOutputDto
 from contentctl.objects.security_content_object import SecurityContentObject
 
-
 #The following macros are included in commonly-installed apps.
 #As such, we will ignore if they are missing from our app.
 #Included in 
@@ -55,10 +54,15 @@ def get_macros(text_field:str, director:DirectorOutputDto , ignore_macros:set[st
         #If a comment ENDS in a macro, for example ```this is a comment with a macro `macro_here````
         #then there is a small edge case where the regex below does not work properly.  If that is 
         #the case, we edit the search slightly to insert a space
-        text_field = re.sub(r"\`\`\`\`", r"` ```", text_field)
-        text_field = re.sub(r"\`\`\`.*?\`\`\`", " ", text_field)
-
+        if re.findall(r"\`\`\`\`", text_field):
+            raise ValueError("Search contained four or more '`' characters in a row which is invalid SPL"
+                            "This may have occurred when a macro was commented out.\n"
+                            "Please ammend your search to remove the substring '````'")
 
+        # replace all the macros with a space    
+        text_field = re.sub(r"\`\`\`[\s\S]*?\`\`\`", " ", text_field) 
+
+
         macros_to_get = re.findall(r'`([^\s]+)`', text_field)
         #If macros take arguments, stop at the first argument.  We just want the name of the macro
         macros_to_get = set([macro[:macro.find('(')] if macro.find('(') != -1 else macro for macro in macros_to_get])
@@ -68,4 +72,3 @@ def get_macros(text_field:str, director:DirectorOutputDto , ignore_macros:set[st
         macros_to_get -= macros_to_ignore
         return Macro.mapNamesToSecurityContentObjects(list(macros_to_get), director)
 
-