Release 2.0.0

[f2prateek]

Just wanted to make a list of what's left for 2.0.0.

• Update website and examples Update website and Readme. #151
• Fix todos https://github.com/square/tape/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=todo
• [] Migrate queues from v1 to v2 format when empty

Anything else?

[NightlyNexus]

Sounds good.

Also, wishlist:
Samples can always come in later.
If Converter artifacts end up being something people want, they could be introduced in a point release.

[darktiny]

Does it mean code in master branch is ready for production usage ?

[f2prateek]

I've been using it in a production app for a few months.
Generally the code on master is always ready to be used for production. Only the APIs aren't guaranteed to be stable (i.e. they could be changed/removed).

[NightlyNexus]

Should those exceptions be a new internal type, or is wording all that's needed? I think I've seen other code do a different type in this situation, but I can't recall where or why.

[sandeep-voxer]

Hello, I haven't seen any new activity here since June, and it's been almost 3 years since the last release i.e 1.2.3 - any idea when 2.0 will be released?

[JakeWharton]

No

…

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:46 PM Sandeep Raghuraman ***@***.***> wrote: Hello, I haven't seen any new activity here since June, and it's been almost 3 years since the last release i.e 1.2.3 - any idea when 2.0 will be released? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#152 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEEETelxIiYyS6a5MnvhDjshst1hxW9ks5siE0mgaJpZM4MWJAC> .

[JakeWharton]

It's already very usable, so I encourage you to try it out

…

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:48 PM Jake Wharton ***@***.***> wrote: No On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:46 PM Sandeep Raghuraman < ***@***.***> wrote: > Hello, I haven't seen any new activity here since June, and it's been > almost 3 years since the last release i.e 1.2.3 - any idea when 2.0 will be > released? > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#152 (comment)>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEEETelxIiYyS6a5MnvhDjshst1hxW9ks5siE0mgaJpZM4MWJAC> > . >

[sandeep-voxer]

Well I guess my concern is whether it's stable enough (in terms of bugs/crashes not API) to use for production apps.

[NightlyNexus]

Yes. Master is stable and tested. This code powers production apps and sdks.
The API is not stable but probably won't change much if at all.

[sandeep-voxer]

Got it, thank you!

[NightlyNexus]

For the remaining exceptions, Java 8's UncheckedIOException seems like a good choice in the future. A simple RuntimeException seems good for now.

[f2prateek]

I think we're ready to release v2. I can cut 2.0.0-RC1, unless there are any objections?

[goghAta]

Yes, release it please.

[dimhold]

Please, release

[JakeWharton]

There is still no code to perform queue migration from v1 to v2 format.

[f2prateek]

@JakeWharton do you think not having the the v1 -> v2 migration should be a blocker for 2.0.0-RC1?

[JakeWharton]

Yes, because it wouldn't be a candidate for release. Perhaps an alpha instead.

…

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 7:04 PM Prateek Srivastava ***@***.***> wrote: @JakeWharton <https://github.com/JakeWharton> do you think that should be a blocker for 2.0.0-RC1? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#152 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEEEcjTfcEmrpcoRFFqIKUNUAq6DN1kks5uWcDggaJpZM4MWJAC> .

[f2prateek]

Makes sense. I'll rework #195 to be an alpha for now.

[sjoerd-michels]

Any idea when v2 will be released?