Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scuttle-shell #260

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

scuttle-shell #260

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

cryptix
Copy link
Member

@cryptix cryptix commented Sep 20, 2018

uses [email protected] which is based on sbot@12

@mixmix this was based on your old branch. I'm not sure about two of the deps in the pkg.json I dragged back in (ssb-horcrux and style-resolve).

.use(require('ssb-ws'))
// .use(require('ssb-mutual')) // this is has recursion problems atm
// Check if scuttle-shell is already running
// TODO - make this check for scuttle-shell specifically (and not just an sbot)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mixmix I'm also not sure about this comment.

How would the shell be different from another sbot with the same plugins?

@christianbundy
Copy link
Contributor

Is this branch still the best way to try scuttle-shell?

@mixmix
Copy link
Member

mixmix commented Nov 27, 2018

yes but i've not tried it recently.

@cryptix
Copy link
Member Author

cryptix commented Nov 28, 2018

I’m using it all the time and rebase it when I see something new intersting. ssb-about@2 should already work for instance.

@cryptix
Copy link
Member Author

cryptix commented Dec 14, 2018

superseeded by #295

(this branch worked for me and I'll leave it up for people who want to try until the TODOs in the new PR are done.)

@cryptix cryptix closed this Dec 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants