Jv two processes listening on the same port #1334
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Adds an integration test that starts two processes which listen on the same port. There have been reports of duplicate listening endpoints. This PR is part of the investigation into that issue.
Checklist
- [ ] Updated documentation accordinglyAutomated testing
- [ ] Added unit tests- [ ] Added regression testsIf any of these don't apply, please comment below.
Integration tests don't need unit or regression tests.
Testing Performed
Running the integration test locally
Running the process and checking with lsof and netstat
Interestingly lsof reports two listening endpoints, while netstat reports one.
Checking namespace inodes
The inodes can be found from the entries with
socket:[<inode>]
. Here the inodes are different. Collector only reports listening endpoints with unique container ID and network namespace inodes. This is why it can report both listening endpoints.Related PR
Note that this PR is similar to #1329
The difference is that in that PR the two processes created have a parent child relationship and here they do not.