Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump version to 21.7.4 #1367

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Commits on Oct 9, 2024

  1. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    3834537 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  2. Fix importing contract crates into other crates for testing (#1364)

    ### What
    
    Change two locations of the soroban-sdk-macros which were gated on the
    contract crates `testutils` feature, to be gated on the SDK's
    `testutils` feature.
    
    ### Why
    
    Recently I introduced a bug into the sdk across two changes:
    - #1344
    - #1336
    
    The bug was that I changed how some code was gated to be gated on
    whether the contract's `testutils` feature was enabled, rather than on
    the SDKs.
    
    Sometime ago in the following issue I changed how all of a contract's
    testutils are enabled/disabled, by being enabled/disabled by the SDK's
    testutils feature:
    - #1301
    
    That change was good, it fixed a horrid issue with testing contracts
    where you could have some contracts in testutils mode, and others not,
    leading to strange errors when importing native contracts for testing.
    
    However, when I worked on the two issues above, I inadvertently forgot
    that we had changed the structure of how testutils code got enabled, and
    I introduced across those two PRs two new locations where we followed
    the old pattern and gated on the contract feature set, not the SDKs.
    
    For most users this will have presented no issues because there all of
    these testutilities are always enabled in a contract's own tests. This
    masked the issue in all of our own tests, but broke setups like fuzzing
    where the contract gets imported. All of our fuzz projects unfortunately
    don't currently build the fuzz components, and so this got missed until
    someone (me) tried to use them.
    
    ### Known limitations
    
    This change doesn't introduce a test to detect this type of breakage. I
    think the way we can detect this in the future is have our pre-existing
    test vector build as part of CI. This issue is tracking that follow up
    work:
    - #1363
    
    ### Merging
    
    This fix is targeting main, but we need a similar fix to target v21,
    because part of this bug was introduced into v21.7.2. Once this change
    merges to main, I will partially cherry-pick it into a backport patch
    release.
    
    (cherry picked from commit 1eaa5d8)
    leighmcculloch committed Oct 9, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f67b4bf View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history