### What
Change two locations of the soroban-sdk-macros which were gated on the
contract crates `testutils` feature, to be gated on the SDK's
`testutils` feature.
### Why
Recently I introduced a bug into the sdk across two changes:
- #1344
- #1336
The bug was that I changed how some code was gated to be gated on
whether the contract's `testutils` feature was enabled, rather than on
the SDKs.
Sometime ago in the following issue I changed how all of a contract's
testutils are enabled/disabled, by being enabled/disabled by the SDK's
testutils feature:
- #1301
That change was good, it fixed a horrid issue with testing contracts
where you could have some contracts in testutils mode, and others not,
leading to strange errors when importing native contracts for testing.
However, when I worked on the two issues above, I inadvertently forgot
that we had changed the structure of how testutils code got enabled, and
I introduced across those two PRs two new locations where we followed
the old pattern and gated on the contract feature set, not the SDKs.
For most users this will have presented no issues because there all of
these testutilities are always enabled in a contract's own tests. This
masked the issue in all of our own tests, but broke setups like fuzzing
where the contract gets imported. All of our fuzz projects unfortunately
don't currently build the fuzz components, and so this got missed until
someone (me) tried to use them.
### Known limitations
This change doesn't introduce a test to detect this type of breakage. I
think the way we can detect this in the future is have our pre-existing
test vector build as part of CI. This issue is tracking that follow up
work:
- #1363
### Merging
This fix is targeting main, but we need a similar fix to target v21,
because part of this bug was introduced into v21.7.2. Once this change
merges to main, I will partially cherry-pick it into a backport patch
release.
(cherry picked from commit 1eaa5d8)