Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update proto definition to v0.55.0 #48

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

anshuldata
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fixed name of Join type which was breaking change. Updated in This PR updated these types PR

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 52.31%. Comparing base (2229c12) to head (eeed6a1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
plan/relations.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   52.33%   52.31%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        6011     6013       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         3146     3146              
- Misses       2676     2678       +2     
  Partials      189      189              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -607,14 +607,14 @@ func (j *JoinRel) RecordType() types.StructType {
switch j.joinType {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you going to need JoinTypeRightSingle and JoinTypeRightAnti for all of the options to be handled without a default clause?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR I intended to keep for proto change so I planned to handle them in a separate PR. I updated PR to add missing ones to indicate unsupported. Kindly check

Copy link
Contributor

@zeroshade zeroshade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there something that needs to be fixed in the CI?

@jacques-n jacques-n merged commit a3e8ee0 into substrait-io:main Aug 20, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants