Skip to content

Issues: tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

New motivation
#296 opened May 19, 2023 by lilnasy
Combining |> with => follow-on proposal Discussion about a future follow-on proposal
#276 opened Aug 21, 2022 by getify
Placeholder name, eg %name follow-on proposal Discussion about a future follow-on proposal
#274 opened Aug 2, 2022 by pie6k
Compare pipeline syntax operators with API function calls documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#273 opened Jul 22, 2022 by sffc
Placeholder scope/visibility question Further information is requested
#262 opened Feb 11, 2022 by dy
README: Method Chaining probably shouldn't be mentioned? documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#238 opened Sep 30, 2021 by benlesh
unconvincing example in readme part Hack pipes might be simpler to use documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#235 opened Sep 28, 2021 by lightmare
In defense of unary functions documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#233 opened Sep 27, 2021 by Avaq
Official changes thread announcement Announcements from maintainers to the community
#232 opened Sep 26, 2021 by js-choi
Floodgate Bot announcement Announcements from maintainers to the community
#231 opened Sep 26, 2021 by js-choi
Role of popularity in the explainer documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#222 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Prior difficulty persuading TC39 about F# pipes and PFA documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#221 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Hack pipes and TypeScript inference of curried functions documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#219 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Need examples of Ramda/RxJS/etc. usage of Hack pipes documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#218 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Impact of Hack pipes on the JS functional-programming ecosystem documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#217 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Role of usability studies in the explainer documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#216 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Frustrations of people looking forward to tacit syntax documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#215 opened Sep 18, 2021 by js-choi
Tacit programming / point-free style and pipes documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
#206 opened Sep 13, 2021 by treybrisbane
Named placeholders follow-on proposal Discussion about a future follow-on proposal
#203 opened Sep 11, 2021 by shuckster
Separate (complementary) F# pipeline proposal? follow-on proposal Discussion about a future follow-on proposal
#202 opened Sep 11, 2021 by mmkal
Text readability documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed
#199 opened Sep 9, 2021 by bodograumann
Optional Hackpipes proposal enhancement New feature or request follow-on proposal Discussion about a future follow-on proposal
#198 opened Sep 9, 2021 by webduvet
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.