Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defined process for handling misscrambles #1266

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

CarterKoala
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@CarterKoala CarterKoala requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2024 15:48
wca-guidelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
wca-regulations.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
wca-guidelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: ohexter <[email protected]>
wca-regulations.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
wca-guidelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
wca-guidelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Add 11i2++ to emphasise that systematic misscrambles are still not permitted
@CarterKoala CarterKoala merged commit e3b8023 into thewca:draft Oct 31, 2024
1 check passed
- 11i1d) The result was achieved by solving the puzzle in fewer moves than the limits defined in [Regulation 4b3](regulations:regulation:4b3).
- 11i1e) Exception: For 5x5x5 Cube, 6x6x6 Cube, 7x7x7 Cube, Megaminx, and 3x3x3 Multi-Blind, an extra attempt is not necessary to be granted under the circumstances described above.
- 11i2) For all other cases, the result may stand. Exception: the WCA Delegate may grant an extra attempt at their discretion if they believe this provides a significantly fairer outcome (e.g. the incorrect scramble received was extremely easy and the competitor achieved a new personal record, the incorrect scramble impacted the podium for an event, or the puzzle was deliberately scrambled incorrectly).
- 11i2a) If an extra attempt would produce a significantly more fair outcome, the original attempt is considered invalid (see [Regulation 9l](regulations:regulation:9l)).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Significantly fairer

@dmint789
Copy link
Member

dmint789 commented Dec 1, 2024

Oops, ignore my comment, I didn't notice it's already merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants