-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Implement Kebechet Managers SLO/SLI metrics #572
Comments
@xtuchyna ping |
@goern have a look at #574 (comment) 🙂 |
@goern @Gkrumbach07 so currently the update advise and version managers are implemented (look at PR to see data files example). I suggest splitting the Issue so we can track the features better. WDYT? |
@xtuchyna ja, pls go ahead and split this issue |
/sig user-experience |
Condensing issue due to inactivity
closing this issue and propagating uncompleted issues to parent EPIC |
@Gkrumbach07: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Problem statement
Related to #560 (section Managers SLO/SLI)
As a maintainer,
I would like to have a look at dashboard with all Kebechet metrics
so that I can see which managers are used and performing well, which needs attention (slow responding time, critical number of rejected requests, and etc.) and which managers are not used (so even if they need attention, they can be of a low-priority).
Acceptance criteria
Create following metrics
(comparisson to the overall number of repositories that have kebechet installed - if a manager has at least one reference in repository history, count it as a usage)
For
Extension
and also
UPDATE after discussion (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jz4j07Q8gkv9H-23BgOp_4qN3uI29JsuP-_kTKEj-e8/edit#bookmark=id.66cutwjvs6o2):
Additional SLI metrics:
(e.g. update manager and contributor comparison - how much did bot commit to the Pipfile in opposed to how much did contributor)
Additional SLO metrics:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: