Expose methods for listing files

[PawkyPenguin]

Hey, thanks for the awesome plugin!

I picked up where #35 left off (new PR because I'm missing write access) and implemented your suggestion about exposing files for a single projection.

All-in-all, three functions are exposed for more or less granular listings of files:

• list_project_files() returns a dict containing files for the whole active project
• list_files_for_projection(projection) returns a dict of files matching a single projection. The projection given as the argument has to be identical to a projection as defined in the config and only the first projection found is returned. I thought about passing a pattern as argument to match multiple projections but that's a bit too crazy imo.
• list_files_for_category(category) returns a list of files of a single "category" (I stuck with the term that Expose a method to list commands and scoped files #35 used but it might make more sense to call it "type" now that I think about it - I can adjust that if you'd like)

I added the third function because I imagine that a user might want to get a list of all his "test"s and do something with them.

If you agree with the changes so far I can add some help docs for them.

[tpope]

I don't understand list_files_for_projection(). If you only care about one individual glob, why involve projectionist at all?

[PawkyPenguin]

I mostly implemented it because of the suggestion you made in #35 but maybe that got outdated over the years. I think projectionist has the advantage that projections only work in certain scope. Say for instance someone working on a project has defined projections for *.scala and *.java in that project, but projections for *.java and *.class files in another project, and projections for *.java and *.png files in yet another project. The user could call list_files_for_projection three times with these three projections and agreggate the results into a list to perform some operation (like packing them into a jar). Projectionist takes care that the jar only contains scala and java files for the first, java and class for the second, and java and images for the third project.

I agree that having to call the function three times is clunky though... It makes more sense to turn the argument into a list of projections. It could also be beneficial to add projection properties to the output, i.e. the alternate file, the console to run etc. - I could pack that into a second PR, this one is already on the large side. What do you think?

[tpope]

I can only assume that I meant a single type, not a single projection key.

I don't really understand your example. It sounds like you are saying you decide if PNG files make it into the archive based on whether someone defined a *.png projection, regardless of what that projection contains. Does that mean if you don't want PNG files in your archive, you are forbidden from using *.png for any other reason?

[PawkyPenguin]

The example was fictional and I couldn't come up with a better idea.

I can only assume that I meant a single type, not a single projection key

Yeah, I've only been using list_files_for_category so far. Then we can probably remove the other method because I can't think of a concrete workflow either. If someone wanted to list files that belong to a projection he could just give the projection a unique type.

I'll rename list_files_for_category to list_files_for_type to keep consistency, and remove list_files_for_projection. I'm gonna add some helpdocs later today.

[PawkyPenguin]

Sorry, got sidetracked. I just amended the commit from before to include the mentioned changes. Documentation has been updated as well.

[tpope]

• Ditch projectionist#list_project_files(). I'm not convinced of its value and it's easy to roll yourself if you need it.
• Rename list_files_for_type to files_for_type.
• Inline get_projection_from_variant into get_projections_from_variants and files_in_projections into files_for_type. I don't find the names to be helpful enough to justify separate single use functions.
• Move the docs into comments.