Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix __parallel_partial_sort call without wait/get #1460

Closed

Conversation

SergeyKopienko
Copy link
Contributor

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko commented Mar 21, 2024

In this PR we add some comments why we shouldn't call .wat() for __parallel_partial_sort result in concrete case.

Another variant (in the last commit) - to add IsSync type into __buffer implementation based on sycl::buffer

See also #1261

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/fix__parallel_partial_sort_call branch from c1baf51 to b9d1217 Compare March 21, 2024 10:32
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko changed the title Fix fix __parallel_partial_sort call without wait/get Add comments to __parallel_partial_sort call without wait/get Mar 21, 2024
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2024 10:35
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko changed the title Add comments to __parallel_partial_sort call without wait/get Fix __parallel_partial_sort call without wait/get Mar 21, 2024
_BackendTag{}, __par_backend_hetero::make_wrapped_policy<__partial_sort_2>(__exec),
__par_backend_hetero::make_iter_mode<__par_backend_hetero::access_mode::read_write>(__buf_first),
__par_backend_hetero::make_iter_mode<__par_backend_hetero::access_mode::read_write>(__buf_mid),
__par_backend_hetero::make_iter_mode<__par_backend_hetero::access_mode::read_write>(__buf_last), __comp);
if constexpr (!decltype(__buf).IsSync{})
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko Mar 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One more way is to add .wait() call here without any conditions and de-facto existing synchronizations inside __parallel_partial_sort (__parallel_partial_sort_impl) due sycl::accessor synchronizations.

@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/fix__parallel_partial_sort_call branch from 54dbbf3 to 542f802 Compare March 21, 2024 14:50
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko force-pushed the dev/skopienko/fix__parallel_partial_sort_call branch from 542f802 to 1bbd90a Compare March 22, 2024 15:06
@SergeyKopienko SergeyKopienko deleted the dev/skopienko/fix__parallel_partial_sort_call branch March 27, 2024 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant